The Price of Bliss: Life, Death, and What Lies in Between on "True Blood"

"All that we are is the result of what we have thought. The mind is everything. What we think we become." - Buddha

You had the chance to read my advance review of this week's episode of True Blood ("I Will Rise Up"), written by Nancy Oliver and directed by Scott Winant, but now that the episode has aired, we can finally talk specifics about this heartbreaking and profound installment of the Southern Gothic series.

It's rare that a series can manage to surprise you, much less make you laugh, cry, and shudder all in the same episode. Yet that's just what True Blood managed to do this week, pulling off a death-defying blend of sex, sacrifice, and salvation.

The notion of sacrifice has lurked beneath the surface of Season Two of True Blood in several forms: we see both the frenzied need for human sacrifice from maenad Maryann and her crazed disciples, the misguided zealotry of Luke which leads to his silver-laden suicide bombing at Godric's nest, and the sacrifice that Godric makes not once but twice.

I had a feeling there was something going on between Godric and the Fellowship of the Sun. I never imagined, however, that Godric willingly offered himself up as a target for their hatred and fanaticism. He claims that he did so because the humans would come for one of them eventually and that he made the first move, turned the other cheek, was willing to die for their sins and blood-lust.

But that's not entirely true either: Godric had a death wish. Or rather, he wished for a way out of his eternal prison, an opportunity to cast off the final remnants of his mortal coil and join the infinite. His immortal existence had become a burden to onerous to carry any longer, a cross too heavy to bear.

Godric's self-sacrifice standing in the first rays of morning light was exquisite and in keeping with his role as a Christ figure in the story. That he would be redeemed by Sookie's tears and her human presence at his very end was as touching as it was gut-wrenching. Several characters alluded to being alone in this episode yet Godric wasn't alone at the end as Sookie was there to see him burst into blue flames and become one with the universe.

That it was a human who witnessed his final moments was important and spoke to the message of love and compassion that Godric understood towards the end: there is more to life than kill and survive, there is a higher morality, a sense of right and wrong. There is the potential for love and understanding between these two ancient enemies. That Eric would want to die with his maker underscores the bond between them but it's not his time to "die," and so Godric commands him to leave. But it's Sookie's rather than Eric's tears which symbolize his final benediction.

I knew he would likely die by his own hand before the season was out but never imagined that I'd care for Godric as much as I did after just two episodes (and one dialogue-less scene). Credit goes to Danish newcomer Allan Hyde for turning Godric into a painfully human and complicated figure whose ultimate end is shockingly memorable.

The scene on the roof between Eric and Godric was absolutely heartbreaking. Despite his duplicity earlier in the episode (more on that in a bit), it proved in no uncertain terms that Eric does have a heart, is capable of love, and does feel something other than malice. When Godric said, "Father. Brother. Son," I lost it and I knew that Eric would as well. How does one go on when one's maker cannot? What does immortality matter, if you are alone? Suffice it to say, Alexander Skarsgard was sensational and this scene between he and Allan Hyde should be included on next year's Emmy nomination reel. To say that Skargard's performance was heartrending is a massive understatement.

Contrast this heartbreak with Eric's mercenary behavior after the bombing at Godric's nest. Despite the fact that he willingly shields Sookie with his own body (perhaps even knowingly sacrifices his own safety for hers), he uses the chaos and confusion to take advantage of Sookie's good-nature, compelling her to literally suck the silver out of his chest as he claims to be dying. But it's all just a clever ruse: he was never in any real danger and could have healed himself and pushed the silver out of his wounds. Instead, it's a manifestation of the threat he poses to Bill, an excuse to get Sookie to unwittingly drink his blood and forge a connection between the two of them.

Those stolen moments--which represent a real evolution of Eric's designs on Sookie--forever transform their relationship. As Bill promises, there are sexual feelings developing between Eric and Sookie as a result of her drinking his blood... desires which become all too clear during a haunting dream in which she and Eric lay in bed naked together. Just what will this development mean for Sookie and Bill's romantic relationship? And for Sookie's own future? Just how long can she fight these feelings?

Sam escaping Maryann by transforming into a fly? Genius. Sam Trammel is playing Sam Merlotte pitch perfectly, managing in a look, a shudder, a turn of the head, to convey a palpable sense of absolute mortal terror every time he is on screen. More than anything, it's his morality that's betrayed when he finds Daphne in the walk-in and he can't come to grips, despite his own preternatural abilities, that he lives in a broken world where callous and brutal murder would be possible.

That Sam would have to turn to Andy Bellefleur as his only possible ally in the battle against Maryann (and turns up at his motel stark naked)? Brilliant. I can't wait to see just what this twisted partnership leads to... but I am very worried for Sam Merlotte. After all, a god's vengeance is raining down upon his head and there seem to be very few who can withstand Maryann's spell. Do he and Andy have a snowball's chance in hell of stopping Maryann? I shudder to think.

I loved the scene between Sookie and Jason at the hotel, in which they finally expressed their love and support for one another. These two siblings have been through so much in the last two seasons yet haven't ever sat down to talk about the death of Gran, what happened with Eddie and Amy, and their own recent, uh, troubles with the Fellowship of the Sun. Anna Paquin and Ryan Kwanten effortlessly pulled off a completely genuine sense of sibling camaraderie in their touching scene together, infusing it with the deep sense of familial love and also a sense of humor. (Kick his head in a bucket around the yard indeed.)

As for Hoyt and Jessica, there is another huge speed bumps to their relationship this week in the form of the spiteful Maxine. I couldn't believe that Hoyt stood up to his bigoted mother (and walked out with half of his grilled cheese and potato chip sandwich) and that he still wanted to introduce Jessica to her even after her reaction. While the encounter at Merlotte's could have been stereotypical--overbearing mother, eager-to-please girlfriend, and Hoyt in the middle--the end result was brutally blunt as poor Jessica, egged on by Maxine, comes to the depressing realization that she can't give Hoyt babies. Deborah Ann Woll's plaintive expression when Jessica realizes this was profoundly agonizing.

The Lafayette-Tara-Lettie Mae-Eggs confrontation had me on the edge of my seat. I love Tara and I hate seeing her being pulled deeper and deeper into the darkness by Maryann. I'm hoping she finds the strength to throw off her influence, though judging from this week's episode, Maryann has her claws sunk pretty deep into Tara. That she could push Tara into a frenzy so easily, send her strangling Lettie Mae without blinking an eye is terrifying. And I'm more than a little worried about what it means that Lafayette and Lettie Mae took Tara... and don't really have a means of calming her down. There's going to be hell to pay... and from the terrifying visage of Maryann at Merlotte's--"a god demands his sacrifice"--there's one hell of a showdown in store for Bon Temps.

Best line of the evening: "I hate your hair." - Sarah Newlin (Anna Camp) to Nan Flanagan (Jessica Tuck)

Ultimately, I thought that this week's installment of True Blood not only ramped up the tension and set in motion a final showdown in Bon Temps but also transformed this seductive supernatural series into something deeper and more profound, pushing it from the darkness into the territory of the divine.

Next week on True Blood ("New World in My View"), Sookie, Bill and Jason return to Bon Temps; Sam and Andy find themselves attacked by a group of bloodthirsty revelers at Merlotte's; Bill discovers that traditional vampire techniques don’t work on Maryann; Hoyt and Jessica try to keep a lid on Maxine’s madness; Sookie tries to push through the darkness consuming Tara.

Next on True Blood: Episode 22:

Masters of Disaster: Buffets, Frayed Nerves, and Close Encounters of the Dale Kind on "Top Chef Masters"

Just when you thought the atmosphere couldn't get anymore heated on Top Chef Masters, the arrival of some extremely talented Top Chef former contestants stirred up even more trouble.

On last night's penultimate episode of Bravo's Top Chef Masters, the master chefs had to work with three sous chefs culled from the legions of past Top Chef participants in order to execute their vision for a sumptuous buffet at the SLS Hotel in Beverly Hills (a favorite haunt of mine, if I'm being honest).

This was an opportunity for the masters to position themselves into the role of mentor, chief, and motivator. To prove, in other words, that they were a true master chef in every sense of the words. Chef, after all, means chief and in the kitchen being the leader means being able to effectively communicate with your team, harness their abilities, and work together as a single organism moving in unison.

Which isn't quite what happened last night. At least not on chef Michael Chiarello's team.

So what happened and how did the four remaining master chefs do? Let's dicsuss.

I've been a huge supporter of Chiarello throughout this competition but his behavior last night left me speechless, particularly his "auditioning" of the former Top Chef competitors and his staggering queries of "What's my name."

These are, after all, established and committed chefs in their own right and aren't applying for a commis job in the kitchen. For Chiarello to grill them about the correct way to address him in the kitchen didn't earn him much love or admiration (or, well, respect) from the cheftestants, none of whom particularly wanted to be selected by him as sous chefs.

Here's a clip:



And that's to say nothing of the altercation between Chiarello and Dale, who turned a comment referring to him as "young man" into a full-blown battle royale in which the former Top Chef contestant seemed to want Chiarello to punch him. For a season that has been remarkably low-key about dramatics, this was the single moment in Top Chef Masters where I could not believe what was unfolding before my eyes.

I understand that Chiarello is a seasoned chef worth his whites, but his wanton disregard for any semblance of respect towards these chefs left such a sour taste in my mouth that I am now actively rooting against him at this point in the competition.

Whew.

That said, let's move onto the food. The master chefs this week had to pull off a huge buffet-style presentation for 200 "Hollywood insiders" at the SLS Hotel and had to roll with the punches as they were given the opportunity to select three sous chefs from among the Top Chef returnees and then had to rethink many of their dishes when they learned that the buffet was now being set up outside in the sun on the terrace at the SLS.

Anita Lo created an Asian buffet with "an array of sauces and condiments," with dishes that included a noodle salad, a raw bar, dumplings, and pork-stuffed pork spare ribs. Lo was let down by the fact that a sun-drenched terrace is not the ideal location for serving raw seafood, the noodle salad seemed a bit pedestrian, and there wasn't a lot of wow factor going on here. Sadly, Lo was in a little over her head and couldn't quite get the logistics and organization under control.

Michael Chiarello offered up a rustic Italian-style buffet, which included three kinds of risotto, prawns, swordfish, and an olive oil cake. Complaints from the critics included that the swordfish was "doughy" and "mealy" and seemed "old," the olive oil cake was far too soaked in oil, and the prawns were overbrined. His presentation seemed more messy/rustic than some of the others and didn't look all that appetizing outside in the heat.

Rick Bayless served up a flawless Mexican buffet that included traditional tortilla soup, a "luxury guacamole bar," pork, a quick sautee of shrimp with figs and nuts, and liquid nitrogen-frozen avocado ice cream.

And then there was Hubert Keller, who offered up an exquisite eighteen-dish buffet that the judges decreed was more like "a million dollars" than the $1000 total budget. And I have to agree. Keller and his team, working in concert, pulled off a daring and incredible array of complex dishes including a Vietnamese-spiced gazpacho with scallops, roasted beets with Cantal cheese, oysters with citrus and coriander seeds, rack of lamb, a selection of elegant desserts, and so much more. It seemed as though they had been working for weeks to pull off an execution that was so polished, so poised, and so confident. Rather like the magnanimous Keller himself, in fact.

Ultimately, I knew that Keller and Bayless (whom I've grown to admire more and more each passing week) would land in the top spots. While I was blown away by the artistry of Bayless' offerings (and the fact that he took a chance by letting the incomparable Richard Blais work his culinary magic with the liquid nitrogen), it was Keller would truly embodied the spirit of this competition and this challenge, wowing the critics (though oddly not the diners, who crazily only awarded him three and a half stars) and the audience with a luxurious and complex feast.

I had a sinking feeling that Lo would be the one to be cut from the competition this week, which is a real shame as I love Anita Lo. But she really did seem out of her element and didn't quite have the vision and organization necessary to adapt to each of the new speed bumps introduced. Which is a shame as I'd have loved to have seen her take on Keller and Bayless in the final round. But alas, the critics seemed to think that Chiarello performed better overall and sent Lo off to pack her knives and leave.

So who will win the final showdown? Will it be Keller, Bayless, or Chiarello taking home the ultimate title of Top Chef Master and a sizable donation for their sponsored charity? Who do you think will walk away the victor and who will walk away empty-handed? Discuss.

Next week on the season finale of Top Chef Masters ("Top Chef Master"), the final three remaining master chefs must delve into their pasts to create a four-course meal; the ultimate master chef is crowned.

Fly on the Wall: An Advance Review of Next Week's Episode of "True Blood"

Every now and then an episode of a television series comes along that changes the way you see that particular series. HBO's True Blood has always been been a fun and often crazy roller coaster ride through some dark Southern swamplands (and through the darker corners of the heart) but I never thought it would touch upon the profound.

That's now changed.

I had the opportunity last night to watch next week's gripping episode of True Blood ("I Will Rise Up") and, the morning after, I'm still turning over this heartbreaking and beautiful installment in my mind. It's an episode that's a game-changer for True Blood inasmuch as it shifts the action from the physical desires of the flesh to something innately divine and, yes, profound and alters the playing field of the second season.

I'm not giving out any spoilers about just what happens in "I Will Rise Up," but if you want to know more about this brilliant installment of True Blood, keep reading.

Credit for this amazing episode goes not only to the stunning work of writer Nancy Oliver and director Scott Winant, but also to the truly extraordinary performances by actors Anna Paquin, Allan Hyde, Alexander Skarsgard, Deborah Ann Woll, Jim Parrack, and Stephen Moyer, to name just a few. Their magnificent turns in this episode elevate an already elegiac story into something penetrating and weighty.

Special kudos have to go out to newcomer Allan Hyde, who in just a few episodes has made Godric one of the most compelling and memorable vampires in recent memory. If you thought his presence in the most recent episode of True Blood had showcased Hyde's considerable skills, you might want to think again: this episode announces in no uncertain terms that a true talent has arrived.

When we last saw the vampires of Area Nine, Luke (Wes Brown) had detonated explosives (along with a cache of silver) inside Godric's nest and the episode begins seconds after the explosion. So who lives and who dies? That would be telling. But it's the aftermath of the attack by the Fellowship of the Sun that also provides one of the series' most shocking moments to date.

So what is "I Will Rise Up" about then? For one, it's about the notion of forgiveness, both in terms of the divine and the mundane. None of the characters on the series have been saints (it's rather hard to do so in a series overflowing with blood-thirsty vampires) but there are several scenes that speak to the redemptive power of compassion and grace.

The truth, as they say, will out in the end and so it does here as several secrets laid bare for all to see. Likewise, the episode deals not only with mercy but also with a mercenary craftiness that's as staggeringly bold as it is shocking... and one that forever changes the parameters of one of the series' central relationships. New alliances are forged, the bonds of friendship are severed, families reunited and ripped asunder, and evocative dreams point the way to a haunting new reality.

Several characters make decisions that will have lasting implications as we begin the race to the second season finale of True Blood. As terrifying as things have gotten for the residents of Bon Temps (including those currently in Dallas), things are only going to get more grim in these next few episodes.

In other words: be very afraid.

All in all, "I Will Rise Up" is one of the most scary, sexy, funny, and perspicacious installments of the slickly seductive True Blood to date. Whatever plans you might have had for Sunday evening, this is one episode of True Blood you definitely want to watch live.

Sunday night on True Blood ("I Will Rise Up"), Eric plays Sookie for a sucker; Sookie and Jason bond over their recent adventures; Lafayette and Lettie Mae try to figure out a way to pry Tara from Maryann’s clutches; Hoyt defends his relationship with Jessica to Maxine; Sam looks for a way to escape both jail and Maryann; Godric decides to take the fall for the vampires' recent PR disaster when Nan Flanagan arrives in town.

True Blood: Episode 21 Sneak Peek



True Blood: Ep. 21 Sneak Peek Clip 1:



True Blood: Ep. 21 Sneak Peek Clip 2:

Doves, Bio-Luminescence, and Fire Squirrels: Love in the Air on the Season Finale of ABC's "Better Off Ted"

I'm going to miss Better Off Ted.

Despite this being the second "season finale" for the comedy series' first season in the last few months, I'm sad that we'll have to be without the gang at Veridian Dynamics for the next few months... until the Victor Fresco-created series returns with its second season in November.

Last night's back-to-back episodes of Better Off Ted made the separation even more painful. Despite the lack of Will Arnett as lousy magician GOB Bluth (we had to do with a better looking clone named Mordor), I thought that the two episodes were pitch perfect.

Besides for the gorgeousness of Jaberwocky's bio-luminescent roof garden (and its fire squirrel), the episodes featured Ted and Veronica giving one of the most hilarious presentations ever created (complete with flash pots) and introduced a new love interest for Ted in the form of Rachelle Lefevre's Rebecca.

I've been a fan of Lefevre's since I first saw her way back when in Canadian feature film Hatley High and I thought she made a nice foil for Ted (Jay Harrington) here. Unlike the slighlty manic Linda (Andrea Anders), veterinarian Rebecca offered Ted a quirky but less high-strung lover, even if it's clear that he's meant to be with Linda in the end. There was some nice chemistry between Lefevre and Harrington that I hope carries into the second season but, as we all know from her recent scheduling conflict-related dismissal from Twilight: Eclipse, Lefevre is a very busy actress. Fingers crossed that she returns.

Linda, of course, realized that she did love Ted and broke up with her boyfriend rather than move in him... just in time to learn that Ted wanted to continue seeing Rebecca. Ouch.

Meanwhile, I loved that we learned--via Veridian's new privacy-busting facial-recognition search engine--that Veronica (Portia de Rossi) is a weekend magician's assistant for the bare-chested magician Mordor (The Ex List's Mark Deklin), whom she has fallen head over heels in love. Yes, the storyline would have been all the more funny if Will Arnett's GOB Bluth hadn't have already pulled it off so magnificently on Arrested Development... or if Arnett had reprised his role as GOB on Better Off Ted, which is after all produced by 20th Century Fox Television, the same studio behind Arrested Development.

Still, I enjoyed the hell out of these two episodes between the secret roof garden, the efforts by Lem (Malcolm Barrett) and Phil (Jonathan Slavin) to be more aggressive, the inside joke of Slavin playing a character named Byron (which he did on Fresco's Andy Richter Controls the Universe), the location of the blindfolded dove, the Pendragons-style metamorphosis of Mordor and Veronica, the maniacal squeals of glee from Dr. Bamba (Maz Jobrani), and, well, every second of last night's one-two punch.

All in all, Better Off Ted has proven itself a delightfully offbeat comedy that's already a must-see series in my household. The wait for new installments in November just got a hell of a lot more difficult. Now where did that fire squirrel get to?

Better Off Ted returns for its second season in November.

Dragonflies and Timebombs: Another Explosive Episode of HBO's "True Blood"

Wars don't just stop when you want them to. They have a nasty way of spreading like wildfire and quickly growing out of control.

This is especially true of ideological wars, such as the one between the vampires and the human-led Fellowship of the Sun on HBO's True Blood. Both sides have become blood-thirsty and mercenary in no uncertain terms and both factions are willing to obliterate some moral codes to achieve their agendas.

On last night's breathtaking and heartbreaking episode of True Blood ("Timebomb"), written by Alexander Woo and directed by John Dahl, the powder keg of hatred and combat finally ignited, leaving stunned viewers to wonder just how grim things will get before the end of the season.

So what happened on last night's episode of True Blood? Grab yourself a bottle of Tru Blood, slip on your honesty ring, sidle up to the hotel bar, and let's discuss "Timebomb."

No discussion of this episode could start without mentioning the truly poignant and disturbing discovery that baby vamp Jessica (Deborah Ann Woll) made upon returning to Bon Temps, which offered this sensational episode an additional sheen of gut-wrenching pathos.

I've suspected for a while now that something had to go wrong with the tender courtship between Jessica and Hoyt Fortenberry (Jim Parrack) because everything has gone so right up until this point. The two innocent lovebirds met cute, overcame obstacles (not least of which was the human/vampire barrier), and both lost their virginity amid rose petals in a luxe Dallas hotel room.

True Blood has never been a happy, sunny sort of series (given, you know, the undead's aversion of sunlight) and I've been waiting for the catch. But I never imagined just how brutal it would be, thinking instead that Jessica would inadvertently bite Hoyt, Lorena (Mariana Klaveno) would maniacally kill him or both of them in recompense against Bill, or some other nefarious thing would occur. What I never saw coming was that virginal Jessica's hymen would reform after sex.

It's a heartbreaking twist that's coldly, brutally logical. After all, vampires heal from wounds quickly and Jessica was a virgin when she died, so why wouldn't her body heal this wound? Her dawning realization, as she and Hoyt attempt to, uh, reconnect at the Old Compton house, is harrowing. Yes, every time will be like the first, as Hoyt tries to tell her, but for Jessica, it's a reminder that this life (or death) is a unendurable punishment. And that in finding love with Hoyt, she's forced to come to terms once more with the fact that she's something other than a girl in the bloom of first love.

This being True Blood, there's a lot of slight-of-hand going on, not just with Jessica. I'm still not sure what to make of Godric or his agenda. Seemingly able to leave the Fellowship of the Sun at will, he's remained their prisoner as he claims not to want to spill blood... and he refuses to feed (though he admits he needs very little blood) off of humans as well. It's clear that Godric is meant to be a Christ-like figure who tells both the vampires of Area Nine and the humans to turn the other cheek, to replace violence with compassion.

The only problem is: I don't trust him. Despite the fact that he could have easily escaped the Fellowship, he nearly let Eric die in his stead rather than offer himself up for the "sacrifice" that was demanded. And the way that Gabe said "it's me" to Godric in the basement said something very different about their relationship than just jailer/prisoner.

So what are Godric's plans? To quell the war brewing between the humans and vampires or fan the flames? His actions seem to speak to the former but I can't shake the feeling that there's more here than meets the eye. Newcomer Allan Hyde plays Godric with just the right combination of godlike authority, preternatural strength, and piety. He's an alabaster saint come to life.

I'm also still deeply suspicious of Steve Newlin, despite Stan's claims that the vampires killed his father. Steve has proven himself to be an ambitious and draconian leader clearly capable of pushing aside morality for self-advancement. I'm still of the thought that he killed his own father in order to seize control of the Fellowship for his own ends.

And despite Godric's call for a truce between them and an end to the violence, Steve sends poor Luke (Wes Brown) to meet his maker, strapping explosives and silver to him and sending him into Godric's nest. Fundamentalism breeds hatred and hatred breeds a contempt for life; that poor Luke would sacrifice himself by becoming a suicide bomber is not only fitting, it also showed just how far Steve Newlin is willing to take his crusade. (I wondered when he palmed the honesty ring that Jason Stackhouse threw at him just what his next move would be.)

Things are going to get far worse. There's no way that the vampires of Area Nine are going to turn a blind eye to this opening salvo and let the Fellowship get away with their attack on Godric and his minions. Given that "Timebomb" is the eighth episode of the season, I wondered just why the writers would slate the showdown between the vamps and the humans at this point and the final scene confirmed that things are far from over in this storyline.

What else did I love? The shifting relationships between the characters for one. There was the tender (and hysterical scene) between Jason and Bill with Jason hugging Bill and apologizing for not supporting his and Sookie's relationship. I'm curious to see just what the writers do with Jason Stackhouse next. He's finally come to his senses--after nearly getting killed by Gabe, shot with a paintball gun by Sarah (in the crotch, no less), and taking down Steve Newlin in his own church--and sided with Sookie and the vampires. He even won over Luke in the end, as demonstrated by Luke telling his former Fellowship brother to get out rather than be killed. Hmmm...

I loved Sookie aggressively standing up to Lorena over Bill in a scene that was rife with tension. Sookie has long been known for shooting first and asking questions later and her lack of fear of the vampires has alternately won the fang gang over or made her an easy target. Not to mention the gripping scene where Eric told Bill that he won't relent in his pursuit of Sookie. Both of them see her as a prize rather than as a powerful figure in her own right and her standing up to Lorena proved that she's either crazy or canny.

Not sure why Bill refused to tell Sookie about Lorena keeping him from her in the first place. Or about poor Barry the Bellhop getting drained by Lorena... who is then hit over the head with a 52-inch plasma television by Bill. The final scene between Lorena and Bill, in which she confessed to still being in love with him and asked when they'd see each other, was a wrenching scene about obsessive passion. A woman scorned, as they say...

Back in Bon Temps, Tara and Eggs unknowingly consumed Daphne's heart (in the guise of a bloody hunter's souffle) and then violently turned on each other before giving into the full-blown frenzy as Maryann watched smiling. I feel that this is all leading up to Maryann forcing Tara to kill Eggs and replace him as her new pet before they skip town for a new habitat. Eggs is becoming increasingly self-aware about the blackouts and his missing time and this makes him expendable for Maryann. I'm hoping that someone other than Sam and Andy Bellefleur figure out what's going on and quickly because Maryann looks like she's about to destroy the entire town.

I figured too that poor Sam would take the fall for Daphne's murder. After all, as Sheriff Dearborn said, this is the second time a dead woman with her heart cut out have turned up at Merlotte's and they know that Sam has been lying about his past. It's good that he's locked up in jail and not an easy target but at the same time he's in the local lockup with many of the people that Maryann has used her frenzy mojo on. It's not looking good for our favorite shifter and I'm praying that Sookie and some other supernaturals get back to Bon Temps post haste and take down the evil Maryann for good.

What did you think of this week's sensational episode? What's Godric's agenda? Who will serve the silver-laden attack on the nest? Who can stop Maryann? And just what will happen next? Discuss.

Next week on True Blood ("I Will Rise Up"), Eric plays Sookie for a sucker; Sookie and Jason bond over their recent adventures; Lafayette and Lettie Mae try to figure out a way to pry Tara from Maryann’s clutches; Hoyt defends his relationship with Jessica to Maxine; Sam looks for a way to escape both jail and Maryann; Godric decides to take the fall for the vampires' recent PR disaster when Nan Flanagan arrives in town.

Talk Back: "Skins" Season Three Opener on BBC America

You had the chance to read my advance review of Skins' third season premiere a few months ago, but now that the episode has aired in the US, I'm curious to hear what you thought.

Did you miss the original cast of Sid, Tony, Michelle, Cassie, and the rest? Are you intrigued by this new batch of unruly teens? Did the tone feel slightly off between the casual and brusque sexuality of Effy and Cook and the oddness of that first day college assembly? Are you completely amused by Pandora or turned off by her sunny quirkiness? Which characters stand out most to you?

And, most importantly, will you tune in again next week?

Talk back here.

Next week on Skins ("Cook"), Cook prepares to celebrate his seventeenth birthday, although things take a turn for the worse when he encounters a gangster by the name of Johnny White.

Quick Bite: Sneak Peek at Sunday Night's Episode of "True Blood"

Can't wait to sink your teeth into Sunday night? No worries as I've got two sneak peeks at Sunday evening's episode of True Blood ("Timebomb").

Here's how HBO solicited this week's episode of True Blood: "Eric arrives to do his master’s bidding on the eve of the Fellowship’s lockdown; Sam makes a gruesome discovery at Merlotte’s and Andy proves no help in coming to his defense; Jessica and Hoyt learn that when it comes to sex, every time is the first time; Tara and Eggs devour a mysterious meal prepared by Maryann, with unexpected results; Jason pays off his debt; Godric looks to enlighten his more single-minded followers."

Can't wait to watch? You can catch the two preview clips below.

True Blood: Episode 20 Preview 1:



True Blood: Episode 20 Preview 2:



True Blood airs Sunday night at 9 pm ET/PT on HBO.

Food Is Personal: Dietary Restrictions Galore on "Top Chef Masters"

It's said that necessity is the mother of invention and restrictions can often pave the way to creativity.

This week's episode of Top Chef Masters ("Dietary Restrictions") forced the five remaining master chefs to do just that when they were faced with their toughest challenge yet: catering a lunch for actress/singer Zooey Deschanel and her friends.

The only problem: Deschanel is a vegan with gluten allergies and an aversion to soy to boot. If they had any chance of pulling off this complicated and restrictive meal, they would have to see beyond the limitations to offer up inventive and thoughtful meat- and dairy-free dishes that satisfied both the dietary restrictions of the party's hostess but also the diverse appetites of her guests.

So, did this challenge prove to be a Herculean task or a walk in the garden for these astute chefs? Let's discuss.

But before we get to the Elimination Challenge, a few quick words about this week's Quickfire Challenge, which had the chefs prepare a spin on the classic burger as well as a side in under thirty minutes. On hand to judge the chefs' dishes were filmmaker Morgan Spurlock (Super Size Me), restaurateur Sang Yoon (of Father's Office here in LA, home of one of my personal favorite burgers), and former Top Chef contestant Spike Mendelsohn.

Top marks went to Rick Bayless for his queso fundido burger with three guacamoles (though I will admit, despite Bayless' tizzy, I wouldn't have known what to do with three guacamoles without any chips) and Michael Chiarello, who prepared a gigantic burger with truffle hand-cut fries. Both landed four stars. But it was a very different story for poor Anita, who walked away with a staggering one and a half stars for her cheeseburger soup, an innovative and original spin on the burger brief that failed to hit its mark. If she had any hopes of remaining in the competition, Lo would have to pull out all of the stops in the Elimination Challenge.

First up was Hubert Keller, who created a trio of items, including: white gazpacho with cucumbers, rice milk, grapes, vanilla oil, and almond milk; timbale of avocado, tomatoes, and asparagus; and roasted beet salad with edible flowers. A masterful combination of flavors and textures on the part of the so-called French angel (Chiarello's words, not mine). I wanted to reach through the television and steal that shot glass of silky, ethereal cucumber gazpacho.

Lo was up next with a spicy grilled eggplant with green lentil salad and a cashew sauce with crispy fried shallots. Main complaint was that the eggplant was almost sodden with oil, far too wet and greasy. Jay Rayner complained that it wasn't properly salted during prep and was far too acidic. Not Lo's finest work this week and I was on eggshells waiting to see if she'd get cut from the competition...

Chiarello smartly went for pasta, despite its glutinous connotations, and instead located some gluten-free pasta at Whole Foods that was derived from protein-rich quinoa. He offered up a dish of quinoa pasta with salsa verde, Calabrian chili, and garlic topped with a pine nut, parsley, and preserved lemon gremolata, oven-dried tomatoes, and crispy fried basil. It was a hearty, meaty meal that contained no meat or actual gluten. Was he smart to buy the pasta? Hell yeah. It was made from quinoa and there was no way he could reproduce it in the time he had. Clever, efficient, and crafty.

Bayless offered Deschanel's guests fresh corn tamales with chili-braised black beans, braised greens, and glazed mushrooms that everyone raved about. The sweetness of the corn was perfectly balanced by the heat from those chilies and black beans. A well-balanced and well-executed dish that proved why Bayless is the master of Mexican cuisine in the States.

And then finally there was dessert. Smith concocted a strawberry and champagne soup, topped with strawberry rice milk ice cream, and homemade almond brittle with bittersweet chocolate. I was just as confused by Smith's choices as the judges. While it made sense for Chiarello to buy the quinoa pasta, it made absolutely no sense for Smith to buy that carton of rice milk ice cream... when he could have easily just made a dairy-free sorbet instead. The dish was messy and unfocused and just showed a lack of imagination and creativity, which was especially odd as Smith himself volunteered to do the dessert course and then dropped the ball completely.

While the top prize went to Chiarello, it came down to Lo and Smith in the bottom two spots. I was freaking out that Anita Lo would be the one to get the boot; despite her lackluster performance this week, she has dazzled overall and I'd hate to see her leave before the final round. But the judges wisely awarded her a half a star more than Smith, keeping her in the competition for another week and sending Smith packing.

Whew.

Did the judges make the right decision? Who would you have awarded the top spot too and who would you have sent home? Discuss.

Next week on Top Chef Master ("Masters of Disaster"), the four remaining chefs must perform their final Quickfire challenge blindfolded and later they must demonstrate their leadership skills when catering a large event... without touching the food themselves.

Top Chef Masters Preview: Fridge Fight



Top Chef Masters Preview: The Right Staff



Top Chef Masters Preview: The Final Quickfire

Reminder: "Skins" Season Three Begins Tonight on BBC America

Just a quick reminder that Season Three of British drama import Skins kicks off tonight at 9 pm ET/PT on BBC America.

Featuring an entirely new cast (save Kaya Scodelario's Effy Stonem), Skins's third season is the perfect jumping-on point for new viewers, though regular viewers of the rowdy teen series might miss Sid, Cassie, Tony, Jal, and the rest of the original gang.

I reviewed the third season premiere of Skins way back in January (you can read my original advance review here) and interviewed co-creator Jamie Brittain back at the Television Critics Association Winter Press Tour about what to expect from the third season, which you can read here.

Be sure to come back tomorrow to discuss what you thought of the episode and about the new direction for the series and in the meantime, check out these sneak peeks at season three of Skins.

Skins Season Three promo:



Skins Season Three Premiere Trailer:



Skins Season Three Trailer 2:



An Inside Look at Skins Season Three:



Skins airs tonight at 9 pm ET/PT on BBC America.

A Room Full of Matches: Red Candles, Romance, and Rage on "True Blood"

Wow.

That was my immediate reaction upon seeing the most recent episode of True Blood ("Release Me"), written by Raelle Tucker and directed by Michael Ruscio, which I was lucky enough to snag an advance screener for about a week ago. (I teased my reaction to this shocking and visceral episode on Twitter here.)

This week's episode offered a major turning point in the second season of True Blood, fracturing some alliances (possibly forever), revealing a traitor, and solving one of the season's most enduring mysteries. All while things heat up in a major way in Bon Temps and Tara begins to see things more clearly than she has in a long time.

So just what did I think about this week's installment? Pop open a Tru Blood from the mini-bar, grab yourself a telepath, put on the Victrola, and let's discuss "Release Me."

Need a refresher before we dive in? Here's a video recap for "Release Me":



I really do think that Maryann would have ritually killed Sam if Andy hadn't wandered into the clearing (looking for the mythical pig, no less) and accidentally fired off his gun. It was a distratction that gave Sam the opportunity to flee, even as he was chased by the bull mask-wearing and savagely clawed Maryann and had to shift into an owl in order to make it out in one piece. As for Andy, he got his arm broken by poor frenzy-afflicted Terry and no one seems to believe his story about black-saucer-eyed zombie townspeople.

But Sam took a page out of Andy's book and sought to get some answers from Daphne at gun-point and is shocked to learn that Maryann is an immortal and a maenad, one of the handmaidens of Dionysus. So just how is Sam going to take Maryann down with little more than a pistol and no allies? I have absolutely no idea but the realization that he's dealing with something as ancient and deadly as Maryann clearly shook him to the core. Still, it was the shock of learning that Daphne had used him so completely that left Sam reeling the most. After finally encountering another shifter, he's so woefully unprepared for the basest of betrayals. Daphne says that she sold him out for love, not money or power.

But it's a love that's utterly base; she's filled with darkness from the inside-out, corrupted by Maryann's influence. It's no wonder that she bleeds black when Maryanne finally stabs her with that sacrificial knife. Daphne has done her job and served her well. But the only payment in kind that Maryann can offer is Death itself. And Daphne never saw it coming...

Given all the discussion of Dionysus and ancient Greek cults, it's interesting to note that, in his flashback to the mid-1930s, Bill Compton is seen reading "Gods and Monsters of Ancient Greece" when Lorena comes in. Coincidence? Or was Bill reading that exact tome for a very specific purpose? Curious.

Just as Maryann releases Daphne from her mortal coil, the notion of freedom plays a looming role over this week's installment, most notably in the forcible physical (and emotional) imprisonment of Bill and Sookie. Forced into companionship with his maker Lorena, Bill pleads with her to release him as he can't stand to be with her or defile himself with evil and wanton acts of murder and destruction. (I am curious to see, however, just where this change of heart came from and am hoping further flashbacks reveal its root cause.)

Their tortured relationship takes on the added dimensions of slavery; Bill is chained to Lorena with invisible links and can't leave her, despite his disgust at what he's become. Just as he threatens to stake himself unless she releases him, she turns the tables on him in the present day, keeping him awake during the day and preventing him from rescuing Sookie at the Fellowship of the Sun church. Despite their weakened state, Lorena is stronger and faster than Bill and she intends to keep her promise to Eric and split up Bill and Sookie, even if she has to stake Bill to do so.

Eric might want Sookie for himself but his actions have placed her into extreme danger. Imprisoned below the Fellowship of the Sun church with Hugo--who is revealed to be the traitor to the Area Nine vampires--Sookie is not only trapped with someone whose love for a vampire has twisted into rage, but she's also very nearly raped by Gabe, after Jason manages to disarm him and take him down in the woods. (Looks like Gabe did too good of a job training him, no?)

Hugo's motivation for betraying them comes from the fact that Isabelle wouldn't turn him and that he believes that the vampires just use them and don't want them to be equal. But it's hard to stomach the fact that he would turn to salvation from the blood-thirsty Fellowship of the Sun and betray Godric to boot. Does this somehow make him even with Isabelle? Hardly. If anything, he's proven his unworthiness.

I was thrilled to see that Barry the Bellhop came back into the plot and played such a crucial role. Unable to reach Bill, Sookie reaches out with her mind to the only other person she knows can hear her: fellow telepath Barry, who brings the imprisoned Bill a message that's overheard by Eric. Just who grabs Barry and pulls him into the hotel room? Lorena? Someone else? I just hope that the timid telepath lives to see the next installment...

Tara's worries about Maryann came to a head after her discomfort about the black-out incident, the sight of Maryann dragging a dead rabbit into Sookie's living room, and Arlene's story about forcing herself on Terry during a black-out lead her to believe that all is not right in Bon Temps and Maryann is the cause of it. Will she be able to throw off Maryann's influence long enough to help Sam stop the maenad? Fingers crossed.

Elsewhere, Jason's abstinence pledge took an even bigger turn for the worse when he slept with Sarah Newlin in the church balcony... and then had to convince her not to tell Steve about her unfaithfulness. So just what does Steve tell Sarah later? That Jason lied to them and was a spy for the vampires? That he betrayed their beliefs (and, unbeknownst to Steve, Sarah as well)?

There's no way that Sarah chased him down in the dark and then shot him with actual bullets, so I'm not concerned at all that Jason's dead. (We never saw the actual impact and, well, there's no way Alan Ball and Co. are killing off Jason Stackhouse right now.) My thought is that Sarah shot him with tranquilizers to keep him from fleeing... and that the duo will have to team up to make it out of the Fellowship church alive next week.

Meanwhile, back in Dallas, there were the beautifully touching scenes between Jessica and Hoyt as they shared their innermost thoughts and then later lost their virginity together. Hoyt's tenderness--blood-scented candles ("they smell like soup"), roses, and sweet music--were nicely balanced by Jessica's brazen hunger ("take your pants off"), a neat juxtaposition that was surprising and earned. These two might just be my very favorite romantic couple on television and their scenes crackle with an amorous innocence and a sharp-edged sexuality.

And then there was Godric. The missing 2000-year-old vampire finally appeared in the present day to rush to Sookie's aid in the basement of the Fellowship church. That he did so quite so easily makes me more than a little nervous. If he's not chained with silver or cemented into the ground, then why hasn't he broken out of the church before now? What is Godric's agenda and just what role will Sookie, Eric, and Bill play? Hmmm...

All in all, a simply earth-shattering installment of True Blood that brought the tension, sexuality, gore, and seething emotion in spades. I can't wait to see what happens next and next Sunday can't get here quickly enough.

Next week on True Blood ("Timebomb"), Eric arrives to do his master’s bidding on the eve of the Fellowship’s lockdown; Sam makes a gruesome discovery at Merlotte’s and Andy proves no help in coming to his defense; Jessica and Hoyt learn that when it comes to sex, every time is the first time; Tara and Eggs devour a mysterious meal prepared by Maryann, with unexpected results; Jason pays off his debt; Godric looks to enlighten his more single-minded followers.

Transformation and Reinvention: Chefs Pay Homage to Each Other on "Top Chef Masters"

Imitation isn't the sincerest form of flattery; homage is.

This week's episode of Top Chef Masters ("Champions Round Begins") had the six champion chefs trading signature dishes and reinventing them in their own inimitable style while still paying homage to the original dish.

But before that, the chefs were put through their paces with a mise-en-place relay race. I have to say that I was impressed by their performances. After all, these are master chefs who leave the prep work to their sous chefs and commis and aren't chopping mounts of onions, shucking oysters, or whisking egg whites in their kitchens on a regular basis.

But for all of that, these masters will know their stuff; their mastery of basic kitchen techniques shouldn't be underestimated and I wonder if even the series' producers were astonished to see how neck-and-neck the two teams were in the Quickfire Challenge. Well done, all.

But there were three "rounds" this week on Top Chef Masters, with the six champions tasked with preparing a signature dish for their comperes, after which they sat down to eat one another's dishes. But this being Top Chef, there was a twist to follow, of course.

So what did the chefs prepare for the "Dinner" Round?
  • Keller: lobster and truffle cappuccino with, leeks, fingerling potatoes, and a corn madeleine.
  • Tracht: chopped sirloin steak with green peppercorn sauce and fried egg
  • Smith: Seared grouper with hearts of palm, trumpet potatoes, and Meyer lemon zest
  • Lo: seared sea scallop with potato puree, bacon, mustard greens, and sea urchin
  • Chiarello: Balsamic and wild fennel pollen quail with mosto cotto mostarda, sauteed vineyard greens, and roasted apples
  • Bayless: roast rack of lamb with black pasilla chile, mission figs, and red wine

And then there was the rub: they'd now have to prepare one of the other chefs' signature dishes and make it their own. They'd have $300 to shop for ingredients and try to show up their competitors by cooking someone else's style of cuisine and respect their original vision. No easy feat, that.

And their guest judges would be none other than competitors cut along the way from Top Chef Masters... which meant that likely their knives were sharpened.

Keller was tasked with reinventing Lo's scallop dish. He prepared a seared scallop with cream of sea urchin over fingerling mashed potatoes with bacon and haricot verts. Everyone praised Keller's masterful cooking of the scallops, which were adroitly cooked, and the sea urchin cream, which was an amazing payoff, though the critics then complained that the sea urchin cream was lacking in flavor. Confusing.

Lo consequently had to recreate Keller's lobster cappuccino with corn madeleine. She radically elevated the French master's dish even more, creating a trio of elements on the plate: a chilled corn chawanmushi, champagne gelee, and a lobster knuckle biscuit sandwich. Lo once again proved herself the chef to beat, with the judges raving about the elements on her plate. I'm wowed by Lo each week as are the critics.

Smith landed Tracht's chopped serloin, which he transformed into a bacon-topped ground-lamb Scotch egg with sweet potato fries and a tomato tart. I do agree with Elizabeth Faulkner that cooking the egg less than hard-boiled would have helped to bring the dish together (and take it away from Scotch egg territory), though Gael Greene loved the tomato tart and the biscuit. Still, overcooked egg, undercooked meat, which Greene said that she was "terrified" by. Hmmm...

Tracht reinterpreted Smith's grouper by transforming it into roast grouper with gnocchi, English peas, bacon, and roasted parsnips. But sadly the fish--very difficult to cook--was definitely overcooked and the gnocchi was stone cold. She did finish WAY too early and let the fish sit too long, rendering it over-cooked. Sad as I love Suzanne and was disappointed to see her struggle here with timings.

Chiarello took Bayless' dish and recreated it with more Italian than Mexican flavors, offering a rack of lamb stuffed with fig mostarda served with chick pea puree and fried rosemary. The judges felt that Michael's dish missed the mark slightly in terms of seasoning, with some complaining that the lamb was slightly too rare. "This to me is the beginning of a great dish," said Mark Peel. "Maybe it's 70 percent there." Did he care more what Rick thought about his dish that the judges? Sure, but even Chiarello admitted this at critics' table.

Bayless then reinvented Chiarello's dish of quail and transformed it into quail stuffed with parsnip, grilled red onion, and prosciutto served over wild greens. Bayless definitely moved away from his Mexican heat and offered up a dish that was very well balanced and deceptively simple. Hell, even Ludo praised it, which Bayless was extremely nervous about. (Love that both Bayless and Lo expressed their fears about cooking for their peers, which was honest and touching.)

Ultimately, Lo and Bayless ended up with the top marks and Lo walked off with the top spot after beating Bayless out by a single star (the closest it's come so far in this competition). Hubert Keller followed closely behind, trailed by Michael Chiarello. Landing in the bottom slots: Suzanne Tracht and Art Smith. But it was Tracht who sadly had to pack her knives and go, landing a half-star short of tying with Smith.

To say that this week's installment was stressful was an understatement and offered the closest challenge yet. I'm sad to see Tracht go but happy to see that things are heating up in the kitchen. I can't wait to see what next week brings...

Next week on Top Chef Masters ("Dietary Restrictions"), the five remaining chefs get ready to rumble in a battle of burgers. Guest diners this week include actress Zooey Deschanel and filmmaker Morgan Spurlock.

Top Chef Masters Preview: It's All About Burgers:



Top Chef Masters Preview: A Few Dietary Restrictions:

The Cruelest Cut: Betrayal, Sacrifice, and Blood Debts on "True Blood"

"Betrayal is the only truth that sticks." - Arthur Miller

I raced back from San Diego's Comic-Con last night to catch the latest episode of HBO's seductive and slick drama series True Blood ("Hard-Hearted Hannah"), written by Brian Buckner and directed by Michael Lehmann, and I'm glad I did as the installment featured several betrayals that had me gasping for air, even as some of them seemed rather obvious from the start. (Cough, Daphne, cough.)

Throughout the season to date, various factions have been moving into place and this week threats to our protagonists made their moves, with Daphne betraying Sam, Sookie and Hugo being taken by the Fellowship of the Sun, Eric luring Lorena to distract Bill, Sarah making her choice to betray Steve, Eggs learning a truth about his past, Pam forcing Lafayette back into the game, and Maryann, oh, pushing everyone into a frenzied state in the woods behind the Stackhouse place.

"Hard-Hearted Hannah" offered one of the most shocking and twisty episodes of the second season of True Blood and made me wonder just how dark things are going to get in Bon Temps before the end of the season. After all, this episode was just the half-way point for Season Two and I have a sinking suspicion that things are going to get very grim for Sookie and her friends.

You can read about my recap of the True Blood panel at San Diego Comic-Con here and then let's discuss "Hard-Hearted Hannah."

Daphne. As I mentioned in last week's write up, it was way too coincidental that two shifters should just happen to be Bon Temps at the same time... and that Miss Daphne showed up at just the same time that Maryann did. This week, we learn that Daphne's go-to form is that of a pig... right before she betrays Sam for good and turns him over to Maryann and her frenzied minions. Is this the payment that Maryann was after before? The forfeit of Sam's life to repay his debt to her... or is she willing to trade his life for servitude?

The wicked looking knife that Carl is holding is clearly meant to reference the remains of the ritual sacrifice that Eggs and Tara discovered in the woods, which would lead me to believe that Maryann wants to make a blood offering of Sam Merlotte himself. But there's no way that Alan Ball and Company are killing off Sam like this so I imagine that something must give.

As for Daphne, did her shifter nature render the maenad's scratches less poisonous than they would have been to a normal human? Is Daphne acting of her own accord or did those wounds enable Maryann some control over her? And if not, why has Daphne willingly joined up with Maryann after she was so savagely attacked? Curious.

Eggs. Poor Eggs gets the shock of a lifetime when he and Tara head out to pick up a spare part for the Stackhouse's old water heater and he experiences a strong sense of deja vu while driving. Drawn to a spot in the woods, Eggs leads Tara to the aforementioned sacrifice site. While Eggs can't remember anything, he knows something awful happened there--the blood on the rock and the torn clothes were a clue--and he's deeply disturbed by what he sees. Could it be that Maryann's glamour over her victims is fading? Or that Eggs is somehow growing less susceptible to forgetting what he saw/experienced?

Sadly, Eggs and Tara discover what Maryann is up to in the back of the house and are sucked into the spell, becoming a part of the dark orgy that Maryann has unleashed. I'm hoping that the duo remember something afterwards about what they saw as someone has to put a stop to Maryann before she destroys Bon Temps or has her followers turn on each other in a blood-fueled rage.

Hugo. I loved that Isabelle (Valerie Cruz) also has a human lover and that she made it clear to Bill right away that he belongs to her. Given their relationship, it seems as though the logical traitor in their midst would be Stan but this could be a red herring. Could it be that Hugo has infiltrated the Dallas vampires just as Sookie plans to do with the Fellowship of the Sun? (Yet Sookie read Hugo's mind and discovered that he was madly in love with Isabelle but that could have been trickery. After all, Steve Newlin seemed to know that she was a telepath.)

Sookie. I'm actually quite terrified to know just what the Newlins have planned for Sookie Stackhouse. Sarah seemed quite upset when Steve wanted Sookie to participate in the lock-in; it's not a good sign that they have Godric chained up somewhere in the basement and then dragged her downstairs. Gabe seemed to think that Sookie's, uh, decolletage would be a plus. I'm not sure if they mean to incite Godric or the Light of Day soldiers. Whatever their intent, it's not good and Sookie is dragged, kicking and screaming, down the stairs while Sarah watches, helpless and crying.

If only Jason knew his sister was imprisoned just downstairs from where he and Sarah are going at it in the church balcony. Oh, Jason, your abstinence pledge lasted all of two hours or so. Sigh. I'm beginning to think that Steve Newlin knew all along just who Jason Stackhouse was--and his connection to Sookie--and that he's been maneuvering him into place all along. This does not bode well.

Bill and Lorena. We got a lovely flashback to Bill during Prohibition Days when he and Lorena posed a sexually adventurous Parisian couple and then murdered their party hosts in their bedroom. It's clear that as Bill's maker, Lorena holds much sway over Bill and physically she is much, much stronger than he is. As for why Eric summons her to Dallas, I'm not sure. The logical reason would be to distract Bill so that Eric can swoop in and possess Sookie for himself... but if that's the case why send Sookie into danger and make it impossible for Bill to rescue her? Surely, Sookie is more valuable alive than she is dead....

Jessica and Hoyt. But among all of the betrayal and animosity and evil, there was one flickering sign of hope this week: the burgeoning romance between Hoyt Fortenberry and baby vamp Jessica Hamby. After Maxine cuts off Hoyt's cell phone access, Hoyt drives out to Dallas to be with Jessica (with flowers no less!) just as she awakens at dusk (and pours out two very expensive bottles of Tru Blood into the sink).

The look of surprise and love on Jessica's face as she hears Hoyt at the door was absolutely beautiful and a testament to the redemptive power of love. She's walking a fine line between innocent girl and cold-blooded vampiric killer and Hoyt could keep her on the straight and narrow. These two might just be the most adorable couple on television and once again I have to give massive kudos to Jim Parrack and Deborah Ann Woll for playing it just right, imbuing their interactions with a sweet innocence laced with the slightest edge of simmering sexuality.

But my favorite scene of the episode has to be the one between Todd Lowe's Terry and Lafayette after Lafayette freaks out when Andy badgers him about his disappearance and Lafayette, clearly suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, cowers in the corner. That Terry--who, more than anyone would know what Lafayette is experiencing--stands up to his cousin Andy was a testament to how far Terry has come as a character. That he would then comfort Lafayette and hold him was a brave and truthful scene about kinship and understanding. And, yes, I'll admit that I did get more than a little choked up. Just a beautifully understated scene that spoke volumes about both Terry and Lafayette.

As for Lafayette, his troubles are just beginning as Pam turns up at Merlotte's to call in a favor. (We didn't really think that Eric offered Lafayette his blood without any strings attached, did we?) It looks like Lafayette is going to be dragged back into the V game whether he wants to or not. But I can't quite figure out why Eric would want Lafayette back in business selling vampire blood. Just what does Northman get out of this arrangement? Hmmm....

Just what will happen next? What are the Fellowship of the Sun's plans for Sookie? Is Godric the vampire they intend to roast in the sun? Why did Eric bring Lorena to Dallas? Who can stop Maryann? And how am I going to wait until Sunday for another installment without going insane? Discuss.

Next week on True Blood ("Release Me"), Sam finds himself in a predicament at the hands of Maryann and her wild-eyed minions after Daphne's betrayal; imprisoned with Hugo by the Fellowship of the Sun, Sookie attempts to telepathically reach out to Bill, who’s being detained Lorena; Jason tries to sever his ties with the Fellowship of the Sun, but gets plenty of resistance from Steve and Gabe.

Pillar of Fire: Televisionary Talks to "Torchwood" Executive Producer Julie Gardner (Part Two)

And just like that, after five incredible nights, Torchwood: Children of Earth is over.

But before we put Torchwood: Children of Earth to bed, I did promise that I would share Part Two of my interview with Torchwood and Doctor Who executive producer Julie Gardner from last week.

You had the chance to read the first part of my interview with Julie Gardner about Torchwood: Children of Earth, but now that the five-episode arc has ended, we can get to the more spoilery parts of my Q&A with Gardner, in which she talks about the mini-series' ambiguous ending, Ianto Jones, the theme of motherhood and family, and The 456, among other things.

SPOILER ALERT: If you haven't yet seen the final installments of Torchwood: Children of Earth, don't read any further. But for those of you who have seen the ending and want to know just what the writers and producers were thinking about certain elements, read on.

Televisionary: There was a lot of public outcry in the UK about the decision to kill off Ianto in Day Four of Torchwood: Children of Earth. What is your take on the reaction--some of which was rather mean-spirited--and why was it necessary for the story for Ianto to die?

Julie Gardner: I think story-wise, I'd reflect on two things. I think the first that is that Torchwood is a series where it is repeated that people die young, that it's very much built into the DNA of the show, that it is a dangerous job and the characters are placed in life-threatening positions. And in a show where the world is in jeopardy and there's a big global threat of huge proportions, there has to be some sacrifice, there has to be a cost to that. It's not credible that our entire team would come out of that unscathed. It simply doesn't make sense.

And then you start to look at, well, how and who. Within the story, it's a story about the sins of the past, it's the story that examines what cost one child's life [has], it's a story that looks at to some extent the darker decisions that Captain Jack may have made, and he's the character that has to suffer. It's an examination of Captain Jack, how to push that character to be the ultimate tragic hero. He has to pay the ultimate price.

So I think Day Four, as painful as it is for me... As an executive producer, Gareth David-Lloyd is the most delightful, professional, versatile actor in the world to work with. I absolutely adore him and that character that he created in Ianto is charming and lovable and heroic and real and ordinary; he's a great character for an audience to identify with. As heartbreaking as it is to kill him off, it is absolutely, unequivocally in my mind, the right thing to do for the story. For the story we're telling, that sacrifice actually motivates the last episode. Torchwood has to be defeated at the end of Episode Four. It has to be as low and outlawed and hopeless as they possibly can be, so that they can rise again.

Televisionary: And when we start Children of Earth, we find them at a pretty low point but by the time the fifth episode ends, we actually see the team completely broken, separated, and hopefully we'll see them come back together in the future.

Gardner: Yes.

Televisionary: Was there a specific decision made not to show The 456 up close but to withhold that sight? Is it that what's imagined is far more terrible than what we can see?

Gardner: I think it came out [of the fact] that we do a lot of tone meetings on Doctor Who and Torchwood. The prosthetics maker, Neill Gorton, who works on both those shows and on The Sarah Jane Adventures, came up with a great design for The 456.

But I think as soon as you are dealing with prosthetics--even with the best prosthetics in the world and the greatest maker--when you are talking about a show that at its heart is looking at something political, something harrowing, something about real politics in the world, psychological terror, and children in danger, I think inevitably you want to go as real as you can.

You start to understand that less is more. It was a very fine prosthetic, but actually it's the reactions of people and it's the fear you bring to it watching that is most powerful. Your imagination is so strong at those points.

Televisionary: One of the most powerful themes throughout the series is that of motherhood. I'm wondering who came up with the idea of juxtaposing the threat against the planet's children against Gwen's pregnancy?

Gardner: It was Russell. The way we storylined was the writers on the five episodes were Russell T. Davies, James Moran, and John Fay and we did days and days of meetings together, myself, the script editors, the producer and I think I remember that was Russell. It's about what's right for that story but it's also what's right for the character of Gwen. All the time you're looking at ways of evolving that character and what's interesting for her, what puts her under more pressure in a story in which children are under threat, it's very interesting that your lead female character is pregnant.

Televisionary: The ending of Torchwood: Children of Earth can be seen as an ending of the series itself but it also leaves the door open for the team to return in the future. Was that an intention story-wise to leave it ambiguous, in case it wasn't recommissioned?

Gardner: Um, it's always a possibility, you never know how your work is going to be received. You never know what is going to be a hit and what isn't; you can't ever judge the audience. I wish we could; we'd all be incredibly wealthy and having a very relaxed time.

I think the end is governed by the tragedy of Steven's death and how the world that slipped into chaos and horror and how Frobisher's story has ended in a very dark way. I think at that point it's very hard to say, oh hurray, here's the surviving team, everything's fine again. It's not possible to do that, I think, at the end of all we've been through and after the death of Ianto. So I think the end for that team is right, it should feel elegiac, it should feel like Captain Jack is going to atone, that he needs time. And of course for Gwen, it's looking at the birth, it's looking at playing out [the fact that] she survived this terrible ordeal and is pregnant and she'll be a mum soon.

[Editor: And if you missed what Gardner told me last week about the possibility of Torchwood returning for a fourth go-around, I've included that below.]

Televisionary: I'm wondering, how likely is it that Torchwood will continue after the five-part transmission of Children of Earth?

Gardner: Um, we're having conversations now. We don't have any firm decision. We don't quite know what we're going to do next. But we're thinking about what could be the next editorial offering, so all I can say at this moment is: hold this space.

Torchwood: Children of Earth will be available for purchase on DVD and Blu-ray on Tuesday, July 28th for a suggested retail price of $29.98 on DVD. Or you can pick up a copy in the Televisionary shop for $18.49.

Flesh and Blood: "Torchwood: Children of Earth" Day Five

"Sometimes the Doctor must look at this planet and turn away in shame."

"Day Five" of Torchwood: Children of Earth, written by Russell T. Davies and directed by Euros Lyn, proved to be absolutely gut-wrenching television, as evocative as it was gripping. In the hands of Davies and his writing staff, Torchwood: Children of Earth is one of the most powerful and moving pieces of television making this year.

As a whole, Torchwood: Children of Earth is about what happens when we reach that tipping point, when the hard choices have to be broached, and sacrifices made. It's also about how the sins of the past always have a nasty habit at catching up to us and how truth will always out in the end. It's a heartbreaking testament to the enduring spirit of the human race and also how easily we as a society can turn on ourselves.

You've read my advance review of Torchwood: Children of Earth as a whole but now that "Day Five" has aired, we can discuss this installment in detail. (And, if you haven't yet watched the fifth and final episode of Torchwood: Children of Earth, beware: SPOILERS aplenty below here.)

I have to begin by saying how absolutely amazing Peter Capaldi was as John Frobisher. For a role that deceptively starts out as little more than a paper-pushing civil servant, his performance in the final installment of Torchwood: Children of Earth turns Frobisher into a tragic figure the likes of which are rarely seen on television. Forced by Prime Minister Brian Green (Nicholas Farrell) to give up his own daughters to the inoculation scheme (read: turn them over to the 456), Frobisher reaches his own tipping point and requisitions a firearm, which he then uses on his two daughters, his wife, and ultimately himself, rather than give them over to a hellish eternal existence.

In Capaldi's gifted hands, Frobisher becomes a wholly sympathetic character, who is forced to perform an unspeakable act in order to safeguard his children's safety. Is it murder? Or an act of mercy? Could he have stood by and let his beloved daughters become the personal fix of an alien race? The way that Green so cruelly and matter-of-factly informs Frobisher of his decision--a calculated ploy to paint the government as dupes of the 456--send chills up my spine. This is a man who values his own power more than humanity itself.

"Day Five" also gives us a street-level view of what the crisis with the children is causing around the world. Davies was wise to develop the character of Ianto's sister Rhiannon (Katy Wix) and here she plays a vital role when Jack tasks Gwen with keeping Ianto's niece and nephew safe. These are the very children who are at risk of being taken and the scenes with Gwen and Rhys running with the children were utterly heartbreaking.

As I said earlier this week, it was especially brave, in a series about the victimization of children, to make the female lead pregnant and in "Day Five" Gwen questions having a child in a world like the one they're living in. How can you bring life into a world that would give up its children callously? Where they could be at risk if the 456 returned?

And yet there's always hope. After making her taped confession about the end of the world, Gwen admits to Rhys that she wouldn't go through with an abortion, that she wouldn't do that to him. Even in a world as topsy-turvy as this one, children still represent hope for a better future.

It's also a world where people are willing to take a stand, whether it's Rhiannon's no-good husband Johnny (Rhodri Lewis), the imprisoned Lois Habiba (Cush Jumbo), Gwen's former copper colleague PC Andy Davidson (Tom Price), Frobisher's long-suffering PA Bridget Spears (Susan Brown), or cabinet minister Denise Riley (Deborah Findlay), the latter of which turn on the Prime Minister when he expresses relieve at saving his own political career after the 456 incident, intending to blame what happened on the Americans. I loved that Davies withheld the reveal that Spears was wearing the Torchwood contact lenses until the very last minute and then she intended to expose Brian Green for the coward he really is... and that Denise Riley took over without so much as a political coup. Justice will overcome, one imagines.

But "Day Five" also finally revealed the truth of what the 456 wanted the children for. A "hit" of chemicals that creates a euphoric effect on them; these children--kept alive forever--are walking bodybags of recreational drugs. That the truth behind the abductions comes down to pharmaceuticals is a stroke of genius. During "Day Four," I couldn't figure out what the 456 would possibly need the children for if the kids weren't keeping the 456 alive. I never could have imagined that this what what they wanted them for, that after getting a taste (from those twelve kids) they now want millions of them. They're little more than alien junkies jonesing for their next fix.

Jack and the British government enabled this situation by handing over those twelve kids in 1965 and even if they turn over millions of children now, there's no guarantee that the 456 won't come back at any point in the future and demand even more. In fact, it's more than bloody likely that they would keep demanding more and more as time goes on. So how to stop them?

Despite still reeling from the death of Ianto in "Day Four," Jack Harkness is able to come up with a plan that could destroy the 456 and prevent the crisis from unfolding. But there's a price to pay for this. In 1965, Jack sacrificed twelve orphans in order to save the planet. But now, faced with the loss of millions of children, there's a different cost, a personal sacrifice that has to be made. And despite his feelings for his grandson Steven (Bear McCausland) and with the knowledge that it will destroy what little love exists between him and his daughter Alice (Lucy Cohu), Jack uses Steven as a conduit for a signal that will damage the 456.

Despite the fact that Jack can't bear to look at Steven as he does it, the fact that he has had to sacrifice his grandson--his own flesh and blood--kills Jack inside more than any bullet wound or explosion. He once offered up strangers to save Earth but now he's forced to give up his own flesh and blood. Is it cruel that he prevents his daughter from seeing her child one last time? Or does he know that there's no way she'll ever be able to let him go? After all, it's both of their lives that Jack gambles away and the dark look that passes afterward between Jack and Alice confirms that their relationship is dead and beyond repair.

It's no surprise then that Jack runs away. He blames himself not only for the deaths of Ianto and Steven but also those of Tosh, Owen, and Suzie as well. But there's nowhere he can go that he can escape his crushing guilt, even as he tells Gwen that he's off to the other side of the solar system. The Doctor knows better than anyone that it doesn't matter where or when you go, you can't outrun your past or your sins.

So is this the end of Torchwood? I don't think so, though the team is completely fractured, battered, and broken. Ianto, Tosh, and Owen are dead, Jack is running, and Gwen is six months pregnant. Something tells me, however, that this isn't the last we've seen of the team. Jack will come home eventually, Gwen will have her baby, Lois will join a new incarnation of Torchwood and the team will continue to safeguard the planet against alien threats.

In the meantime, just keep your fingers crossed for Season Four of Torchwood. I know I am.

What did you think of Torchwood: Children of Earth? Were you surprised by the twists and turns along the way? Is this the end of the team and the series? Will Jack return from the stars and what will happen to Gwen's baby? Discuss.

Torchwood: Children of Earth is available for purchase on DVD Tuesday, July 28th for a suggested retail price of $29.98. Or you can pre-order a copy today in the Televisionary store for $17.49.

Innocence Lost: "Torchwood: Children of Earth" Day Four

"Three-two-five-zero-zero-zero."

The latest episode of Torchwood: Children of Earth ("Day Four"), written by John Fay (who scripted "Day Two") and once again ably directed by Euros Lyn, was absolutely heartbreaking on a number of levels.

It was inevitable that death would once again cast its pall over the Torchwood team but what was wholly unexpected were the callous actions and behavior of the PM's cabinet as they debated the criteria for deciding which of the nation's children will be offered up as human sacrifices to The 456, especially in light of what happened to the original twelve children taken in 1965 in the United Kingdom's first dealing with the alien race.

Just what happened to these children? What are the criteria for choosing the next sacrifice? What is the cost of one child's live? And can Torchwood stop the 456 in time to prevent an outright war? Hmmm...

You've read my advance review of Torchwood: Children of Earth as a whole but now that "Day Four" has aired, we can discuss this installment in detail. (And, if you haven't yet watched the fourth episode of Torchwood: Children of Earth, beware: SPOILERS aplenty below here.)

While there's still one last installment left to go, "Day Four" of Torchwood: Children of Earth proved itself to be the most harrowing and poignant yet. It also managed to transform a taut sci-fi-tinged political potboiler into a full-blown ethical debate about the value of life, the eternal struggle between the classes, and the nature of sacrifice.

There have been few sights more shocking--in any drama series, really--than the reveal in "Day Four" of that poor child hooked up to the monstrous 456 inside the tank. It was a stunning twist that I did not see coming at all. The 456 promised Jack Harkness that the children they took would "live forever." And, in a way, they have: confined to a hellish existence as little more than a parasitic host for their captors. Just what the 456 is using them for remains to be seen but the fact that they have been kept in a state of arrested aging does not bode well. These creatures aren't after our natural resources or our planet itself: they are harvesting our very future, using these children for their own ends, and they've proven to have developed an appetite for them in the forty-odd years since they last dropped by Earth.

What's upsetting about "Day Four" isn't just the fact that children are being brutally victimized, it's also the ease with which the government decides WHICH children are more expendable. When Prime Minister Brian Green (Nicholas Farrell) and John Frobisher (Peter Capaldi) sit down with Gold Command to discuss their counter-offer to the 456, who have demanded ten percent of the Earth's child population, is the very moment that Torchwood: Children of Earth becomes something more than just suspenseful entertainment; it's become a thought-provoking examination of the choices we make under pressure, the decisions that are made when governments are up against the wall, and the value of human life.

Their debate quickly descends into the grim murkiness of moral relativism. If they have to provide the 456 with ten percent of their children, it not only won't be their children getting sacrificed. Unaccompanied asylum seekers are the first to be thrown on the fire; after all, "no one will miss them," the very same argument that Jack Harkness made about the orphans in 1965. But the government also needs to plan for the future, to ensure that the factories and hospitals of tomorrow will be staffed with tomorrow's workers. That means targeting the underperforming schools whose students won't grow up to offer society all that much: the poor, the unemployed, the hoodlums, and the council estate inhabitants.

And yet the very idea of these children should be sacrificed is sickening. That each child should be judged as unimportant or non-essential because of the circumstances of their birth and childhood. Who is to say that they won't grow up and improve the planet we live on, that they won't rise above their station in life and make a difference? But there's no scientific way to predict that and in their blindness and hubris the government--who quickly deem these children "units" to be bartered with--decides that this is the best way to ensure stability. But what price stability compared to a parent's love?

Still, there's a spin for everything. Find a civil servant and they'll be able to turn any situation around for the better. And so they do here. After all, Earth's population is spiraling out of control and putting a strain on the planet's natural resources; a culling of ten percent of the future population could actually be "good." That this ten percent would reflect the unwanted or missable elements of society is an additional perk.

I think I threw up in my mouth a little bit. I don't think that a US network would have ever approved this storyline and I have to applaud the BBC, Russell T. Davies, and the cast and crew of Torchwood: Children of Earth for having the courage to produce a series that is asking some tough questions.

As for The 456, it is a protection racket they're running. We learn that in 1965 the Earth was threatened with a mutated strain of Indonesian flu that could have wiped out much of the world's population and the 456 provided them with an antivirus in exchange for twelve children. Did Jack make the right decision? Does the good of the many outweigh the good of a few? Are the lives of twelve children worth that of billions of people? Jack Harkness would argue yes, that he made the only decision available to him: save as many people as possible. After all, The 456 promised to stay away. But, like any protection racket, it was only for a time and now they're back and they want even more children.

They're more than willing to prove their point, to demonstrate their power by unleashing a virus in Thames House and initiating a complete lock-down of the facility. I'm not sure quite how they were able to pull off this gambit, other than the fact that their technology is far more advanced than our own (see how they silenced remnant Clem) but the results are devastating, not least of all for Torchwood itself.

Which brings us to poor Ianto.

I'm sure a lot of people are extremely angry that the writers have killed off Ianto Jones (for a full explanation of why, come back on Friday evening for Part Two of my exclusive interview with Torchwood executive producer Julie Gardner) but I feel that his death was necessary for the story at hand. It was inevitable that someone would die during Torchwood: Children of Earth as the stakes were so high, but it couldn't be Jack (he's immortal) and Gwen is the audience's entry point to the story, so it couldn't be her.

Much of the action in these episodes has focused on Jack and Ianto's relationship--and the secrets which Jack kept from his lover--making it only fitting that one of them should die before they get their happy ending. (Torchwood fans know there's never a happy ending to be had.) And it was a hell of a way for Ianto to go, standing at the side of his lover, guns blazing as he was poisoned by an alien virus. But even as he died, his thoughts weren't of going softly into the night but rather that Jack would forget him in time.

Like I said, absolutely heartbreaking. Ianto won't be forgotten, not by Jack nor by Torchwood's fans. The look of realization and sorrow on Jack's face as he comes back to life spoke volumes about how Ianto's death has struck him. And remember at the end of the day, it was Jack who colluded with the aliens back in 1965. If he had taken a stand against them, none of this would have come to pass, not the current situation or Ianto's death. If anyone blames themselves for Ianto's death, it's Jack. And I'd say that it will be a long time before he can unload that guilt.

If Ianto's death seemed to prove that one person can't make a difference in the face of unbeatable odds, the bravery of Lois Habiba (Cush Jumbo) in standing up to the Prime Minister and Gold Command and unmasking herself as a spy for Torchwood proved that it only takes one whistle-blower to reveal the truth. So much of what has happened has been buried--blank pages, off the record conversations, conspiracies designed to suppress the truth--that it becomes easy to keep silent, to avoid taking a stand, and to allow horrors to unfold before your very eyes. Despite being just a PA and tea girl, Lois does set off a revolution right there in the cabinet room. Can these people hide behind the Official Secrets Act when everything can be made public record?

The truth about what they're proposing comes as a shock even to Johnson (Liz May Bryce), whose mission has been to ruthlessly hunt down and exterminate Torchwood and hold Jack's daughter Alice Carter (Lucy Cohu) and grandson Steven (Bear McCausland) as leverage against Jack getting involved with the 456 affair. But as Torchwood managed to trick Johnson and her militia into "finding" Gwen and Clem at Torchwood Hub 2, Johnson is stunned by what her employers are proposing. Could it be that Torchwood has some new allies?

As for Jack himself, his daughter Alice sums it up best: "A man who can't die has got nothing to fear." She meant it in reference to Johnson, but it applies to the 456 as well. He's got nothing to fear but also, after Ianto's death, nothing to live for either. All of which makes him extremely dangerous...

On the finale of Torchwood: Children of Earth ("Day Five"), the future of the human race is in jeopardy as the world descends into complete anarchy.

New Tricks and Old Ghosts: "Torchwood: Children of Earth" Day Three

"We are here."

"Day Three" of Torchwood: Children of Earth, written by Russell T. Davies and James Moran, certainly brought with it some rather unexpected twists, along with an extra heaping of tension, suspense, and terror as The 456 arrived at Thames House and announced just what it is that they want.

Meanwhile, Torchwood attempted to use PA Lois Habiba (Cush Jumbo) as their literal eyes on the inside and get their new base of operations--nicknamed Hub 2--up and running so that they could stop The 456. That is, until Jack took off without so much as a by-your-leave.

So what do The 456 want? What does Clem know? Why is Frobisher so hell-bent on keeping the previous encounter between Britain and The 456 off the record? Let's discuss.

You've read my advance review of Torchwood: Children of Earth as a whole but now that "Day Three" has aired, we can discuss this installment in detail. (And, if you haven't yet watched the third episode of Torchwood: Children of Earth, beware: SPOILERS aplenty below here.)

I thought that "Day Three" was absolutely bloody brilliant. Despite the fact that the episode, scripted by series creator Russell T. Davies and James Moran, had a hell of a lot to cover in an hour's time, it never felt rushed or overblown, instead slowly building the tension towards The 456's arrival--via a pillar of fire no less--at Thames House and escalating things until the realization of Jack's involvement in the 1965 Scotland encounter and the reveal of what The 456 what for their "gift."

But before then, there were some nice character moments: Ianto taking the team to an old Torchwood One holding facility, Rhys using the grease to dub the place Hub 2 (making him an honorary member of the team) and cooking the gang beans, Jack letting the cat out of the bag and telling Rhys he knew about Gwen's pregnancy before Rhys did; Ianto looking for some shenanigans in the dark with Jack, despite the world coming to and end; Gwen's meeting with Lois in which she begged her to use the Torchwood contact lenses, which would allow them to spy on the proceedings at Thames House.

Speaking of which, Cush Jumbo is quite a remarkable find; she gives Lois a steely quality while keeping her absolutely sympathetic and engaging. On lesser series, there would be a bit of Mary Sue-ness about her but here Lois is a conflicted character torn between her duty to her job and her duty to her country, embodying a might versus right debate that seems hardwired into Torchwood: Children of Earth's DNA. The scene in which Gwen pleads with her and forces the contact lenses into her hand is fantastic; both women clearly share the same agenda but only one can put herself on the front line. It's a nice echo of PM Brian Green (Nicholas Farrell)'s assertion that Frobisher being put on the front line isn't an honor: he could be the first to fall. Both Gwen and Lois are aware of the risks involved so when Lois does put in those contact lenses, it's a victory for Torchwood, giving them the ability to remain in the game.

And make no mistake: the stakes are higher than they've ever been. Frobisher (Peter Capaldi) proves this when he holds a private audience with The 456 before the aliens can speak to anyone else. He wants it made absolutely clear that any previous conversations or encounters between the UK and the 456 are to remain completely off the record. Why exactly? Because Frobisher doesn't want the rest of the world learning just what happened last time The 456 showed up on British soil... and walked away with twelve children as a result, a "gift" handed to them by Jack Harkness himself.

We know the what now but not the why. Why would the British government willingly give over twelve innocent children to a possibly hostile alien race? And why would Captain Jack Harkness of all people agree to deliver these souls to them? What were The 456 holding over their heads? What price do the lives of twelve children have? That's the mystery now. Jack says that The 456 have shown themselves to be untrustworthy by dint of the fact that they have returned, which makes me believe that these twelve were a virgin sacrifice, a necessary evil to ensure that The 456 went away peacefully.

But, if that's the case, why cover it up? Why order the execution of Jack Harkness and others who were there that night in 1965? Because they could blow this thing sky-high, of course. They could let the other nations of the world know that the United Kingdom negotiated with these creatures, delivered children to them, and swept it all under the rug. There's no way to manage the potential fallout from such a realization nor the damage it would do to the British government.

Which is why Frobisher isn't taking any chances. As soon as he and Johnson (Liz May Bryce) become aware of the existence of Jack's daughter Alice Carter (Lucy Cohu) and his grandson Steven (Bear McCausland), they make their move and bring them in. But Alice is Jack's daughter through and through. Cohu is sensational and she proves the depth of her parentage, grabbing a kitchen knife and her son and sneaking out of the garden when she realizes things have gone too quiet outside. Loved that she clobbered one of the agents and took his firearm (very Jack) and reminded Steven to play the game that his grandmother--ex-Torchwood operative Lucia Moretti--had taught him. Hell, even her grey overcoat nicely echoed that of her father Jack's military coat. (Nice little visual cue there to link them together.)

As for The 456, they are even more terrifying than I could have imagined. Kudos to Davies and Co. to actually avoid showing them outright, making the unseen even more eerie and menacing than something tangible and visible. The fact that they are obscured by poison smoke, vomiting, screeching, and flailing about makes them even more unknowable, even more dangerous, and even more of The Other. The disembodied voice that hisses out of the speakers is far more ominous and forbidding than a prosthetic alien.

And then there's poor Clem (Paul Copley), a man tortured by ghosts from the past, by his memory, by scents on the air. He's still connected by some invisible thread to The 456 and is aware of their movements. He knows what they want, he can sense them, and he recognizes Jack as one of the instruments of men which delivered him into their care. (Or tried to, anyway.) Why was Clem spared? Just what will this knowledge do to the already-battered Torchwood team? How on earth will Jack be able to justify his actions? And will there even still be a Torchwood when this is all over? Find out tonight...

On Day Four of Torchwood: Children of Earth, the mysterious events of 1965 become clearer and the true intentions of the 456 are finally revealed.

Mystery Box: The Master Chefs Make Secret Ingredients Sing on "Top Chef Masters"

One thing that has separated Top Chef Masters from its predecessor is that these master chefs--for the most part, anyway--really do seem to love and support one another in a way that the hungry chefs on Top Chef really don't seem to do.

This week's episode of Top Chef Masters ("Trick In A Box") could have been a prime opportunity for the chefs to stab each other in the back but the elimination challenge--in which Art Smith, Jonathan Waxman, Roy Yamaguchi, and Michael Cimarusti all had to shop for one another and prepare a mystery box of ingredients--resulted not in sabotage and subterfuge, but rather a celebration of both ingredients and one another.

Aw.

I thought that this week's gathering of master chefs was one of the toughest groups yet and each of them had some major strengths they were playing for, plus they each had such different, individual styles of cooking. Cimarusti of Los Angeles' Providence excels at seafood; Yamaguchi is the creator of Hawaiian fusion; Smith is the epitome of Southern cooking; Waxman was one of the forerunners of today's ingredient-obsessed culinary attitude. Each of them brought something different to the table.

So how did they do? Let's discuss.

For their Quickfire Challenge, the four master chefs had to prepare dishes constructed entirely of ingredients found in a specific supermarket aisle (a flashback to Season Three of Top Chef) and in the Top Chef kitchen. But they wouldn't know what they got stuck with until they arrived at Whole Foods.

Given the time constraints and the ingredient specifications, I was curious to see just what these four guys would come up with in the time they had. I was especially worried right off the bat by how Roy Yamaguchi would do as he was the first to admit that he doesn't think very well on his feet and usually takes more time to construct a menu.

Smith prepared a multi-grain risotto with a crispy rice salad. I wasn't sure how the combination of rices would present itself but the judges--a group of Whole Foods employees--seemed to be extremely pleased by his dish. I think the difference in textures played a large role in keeping the two elements unique but complimentary. Meanwhile, Waxman offered a mint, lentil, and roasted pepper salad that looked extremely messy on the plate (he admits that he cares more about the taste than presentation) but sounded incredibly tasty.

Yamaguchi cooked up pasta with vegetables, a fried egg, and Asian flavors. I was concerned by the construction of this dish; I can see doing a strand pasta--rather than penne--with egg but I probably would have made the dish a little lighter and more focused on spring, introducing some asparagus and parmesan to the mix, and poaching the egg rather than frying it. Not sure how the fried egg really related to the rigidness of the penne.

And finally, Cimarusti tempted the judges with a chocolate parfait with ginger syrup, Sauternes, and sesame crackers. This to me was the perfect dessert effort for a chef who doesn't focus on pastry. It was innovative, delicious, and beautifully presented and executed. Dessert doesn't need to be pastry or poached fruit; there's a number of alternatives that make sense and are easy to prepare. Cimarusti was extremely clever about this and walked away with a full five stars for his dessert course. Top Chef contestants: let Cimarusti's performance be a lesson for you when "stuck" with a dessert course. (Well done, Michael!)

If the Quickfire was tricky, the Elimination Challenge this week would really test the chefs and see just how truly supportive they are of one other. Each of them drew knives to determine who they would be shopping for and then would then prepare a dish using ingredients from their mystery boxes.

Art Smith prepared fried chicken two ways: a classically crisp fried drumstick and smothered fried chicken, which he served with a teeny-tiny mango pie with a flaky crust. I think he was smart to include that sweet offering on the plate and then entire dish just screamed down-home comfort food. Did he need to do two chicken dishes? Not really but I do think it elevated the offering from home dining to fine dining with the inclusion of three distinct yet interconnected elements on the plate. He would be the one to beat here.

Joanthan Waxman created a monster of a plate with pork sausage and pork chop with cauliflower and celery root puree studded with black truffles. While again the presentation was a little spotty--too huge of a plate, too much saucing all over the place--the taste was incredible, earning raves from the culinary students and judges alike. (Save the uber-picky James Oseland, who seemed not all that pleased about the truffles being microplaned rather than shaved.)

Michael Cimarusti created a gorgeous dish of lamb loin with sunchoke puree, broccoli rabe, purple cauliflower, roasted mushrooms, and mandarin orange sauce... the latter of which didn't end up on all of the plates. Some of the judges liked the inclusion of the sauce, which tied everything together, while Gael Greene thought she liked it better without the sauce. Never a good move not to get everything plated in time but Gail Simmons raved about the roasted mushrooms, which sparkled with the acidity and sweetness of the mandarin orange juice Cimarusti added at the very end.

Roy Yamaguchi paired a short rib kalbi and mahi mahi fillet with noodles, a plate that seemed almost schizophrenic. I'm not sure how the two elements on the plate were supposed to relate to one another and they seemed almost in competition, with one judge exclaiming that it seemed like two separate courses on the plate. We know Yamaguchi isn't one for improvisation but this seemed like a major misstep, especially as some of the mahi-mahi was overcooked. I think he was out of the mix right away.

Ultimately, it was Art Smith who moved on to the next round for his exquisitely prepared fried chicken. I was really pulling for Waxman or Cimarusti to make it to the champion round; both seemed like such passionate chefs in their own right and Smith's constant name-dropping rubbed me the wrong way throughout this episode.

Do you agree with the judges that Art Smith should have been the one to move on to the champions round? If not, who do you think should have won this round and why? How do you think the master chefs fared overall? Discuss.

Next week on Top Chef Masters ("Champions Round Begins"), the six heat-winning chefs prepare to cook their signature dishes, with a surprising twist as they must then recreate one of their competitors' offerings for the critics to sample.

Top Chef Masters Preview: Rick vs. Michael



Top Chef Masters Preview: Mise En Place Relay Race



Top Chef Masters Preview: Elimination Spin

Days of Wine and Roses: Televisionary Talks to Rich Sommer of AMC's "Mad Men"

There won't be any Lost-style jumping through time for the cast of AMC's Mad Men, which returns next month.

I caught up last week with Mad Men's Rich Sommer--who plays the bow-tied Harry Crane, the head of television at Sterling Cooper--the day after the Emmy nominations were announced to try and ferret out some information about Season Three of Mad Men and what circumstances we'll find Sommer's Harry Crane under when the series returns with new episodes on August 16th on AMC.

While Sommer was slyly tight-lipped about revealing any concrete information about the season (or whether it takes place before or after the JFK assassination), he did promise that the first episode of Season Three "pretty much kicks down the door right away" and assumes that viewers have been with the series since the very beginning. (In other words, make sure you refresh your Mad Men knowledge by picking up the second season on DVD straightaway!)

Televisionary: Congratulations on Mad Men snagging sixteen Emmy nominations yesterday!

Rich Sommer: Thank you. Very, very exciting day.

Televisionary: Were you surprised at all by the outpouring of Emmy love for the show?

Sommer: Well, last year we got sixteen [nominations] as well and I thought we'd get some love because I think that the people who work on the show are incredible but I did not expect to meet what we did last year. I thought that people would be kind of... I dunno, I just thought that some of the shine would have come off of it but I'm happy to know that people feel about the show the way we do.

Televisionary: What's amazing is that, over the past two seasons, Mad Men has become an absolutely important part of the TV landscape. Did you have any idea when you first joined the show that three seasons later it would be quite as iconic as it is today?

Sommer: Not in the least. I mean, people after the first season would ask me did you know it was going to be this good or this interesting or different and I always said "yes" to that. Absolutely. I knew it was something very unique from the beginning. At this point did I know that it would be as impactful as it's been or as, sort of, well-received as it's been? Absolutely not. I never anticipated the level of success we seem to have gotten.

Televisionary: So, Season Three kicks off next month and everybody's very anxiously awaiting the start of the new season. I'm wondering if you can give us any hint as to when exactly it takes place. Can you tell us if it's set before or after JFK's assassination?

Sommer: I can't tell you any of that. It is certainly in the future from where the last episode was. I can tell you that we don't go back in time. Um, but I can't really nail down any specifics.

Televisionary: I think you saw the first episode of Season Three already?

Sommer: I have. I just saw it this week.

Televisionary: Can you tell us anything about what Season Three is about thematically?

Sommer: It's my understanding the way Matt [Weiner] has put it, it's about change. It's about people changing... It's so hard. (Laughs) I feel bad because there's so little not only that I'm allowed to say but I also am always so nervous about blowing people's enjoyment of the show. As an avid TV viewer, I know how much I like to be surprised and so it's hard for me to like to give anything away at all.

I mean, thematically it's about change. And I can say too that this first episode of the third season is different from the first episode of the second season where, personally--and maybe Matt or the other writers would disagree with me--but I felt that the first episode of the second season was sort of a breath of relief that we were back because we had no idea if we'd be back at the end of that first season... I don't know if you remember how it opened but it opened with "Let's Twist Again Like We Did Last Summer" and sort of like a happy dance.

And this season does not waste any time on that. It pretty much kicks down the door right away. It assumes that you've been there for the entire story and requires that you've been there the whole time and it starts right out of the gate. It's really great.

Televisionary: Season Two saw Harry go through a lot of changes himself and had him standing up for himself and becoming the head of the TV Department at Sterling Cooper. What kind of situation do we find Harry in at the start of Season Three in terms of his emotional context?

Sommer: I think you get to see a guy who got what he asked for. I mean, he got what he wanted and kind of got what he asked for and any kind of connotation that could mean. The change that you see is big things but you just kind of see how a promotion like that, for a guy who was sort of on the same level with everyone else, can affect someone's mentality and not only that person's mentality but the mentality of the people around him in dealing with him.

Televisionary: When we last saw Harry, his wife Jennifer was going to have a baby and I'm wondering, as a father yourself, are we going to see this baby change the relationship between Harry and Jennifer? Should we be looking for any pained looks from Harry towards Hildy?

Sommer: (Laughs) I have to sort of plan my route of attack on any of these answers... Babies always impact a relationship. Certainly, I know that in my real life, it's changed ours for the better. We're kind of a team on this weird, human project which is awesome. And different people react to it in different ways. How it affects Harry and Jennifer is unique to Harry and Jennifer's situation. Sorry to be so vague! (Laughs)

Televisionary: It often seems that Don and Roger treat Harry as though he's somewhat beneath them. Do you think that Harry will ever be able to earn Don's respect?

Sommer: I hope so. I mean, I hope for Harry, speaking sort of from the point of between Seasons Two and Three, I hope he can. I mean, it only seems to make sense. He's a guy who is on the cusp of what is going to be one of the biggest media revolutions ever and somehow he got in on the ground floor and I'm positive he didn't even know he was doing it. Yeah, I think that if he doesn't completely screw it up there's got to be, at some point, some deference to that.

Televisionary: Matt Weiner is very particular about every period detail. Is it frustrating or liberating to work on a show that pays such strict attention to the small details?

Sommer: Oh, it's so liberating. It makes our jobs so much easier. Not only on the period detail, but on the detail in the writing--the way it's so carefully written--it makes our jobs so much easier. We truly have to learn the lines and say them out loud and that would be it.

Ronnie Pipes, who is one of our makeup artists, and I were talking last night--we had a little gathering to celebrate the Emmy nominations--and Ronnie was saying (this is a guy who was just nominated for another Emmy for the makeup on the show), it's not a show that's just about the look, it's not a show that's about the costumes, this is a writers' show. This is a show that's totally about the writing. And we could do this thing in black capes and sweatsuits that had no definition at all (laughs) and you would still get a story that we'd argue would be as compelling as any other on television.

You look at the Emmy nominations yesterday. Four out of the five nominations for drama series [writing] were for our show, which is ridiculous! It's crazy and it's wonderful and I think it's a testament to how well these people do their jobs.

Televisionary: Obviously you're working on a period show. Does it ever force you to step back and kind of make you see our own times in a different way?

Sommer: Sure. We used to talk about it during the first season. This show is less about how much things have changed and more about how much they haven't. It seems to me that the only real difference between how the characters behave and speak on our show and how people behave and speak now is they were slightly more brazen about how they did it, in general.

I mean, there are still people who are just as brazen but anything that these characters are saying people are still thinking now whether it has to do with gender or race or religion. Any of that stuff. I just think we've sort of put this veneer of "PC" over it but I don't actually think attitudes have changed that much. I mean that's a little bit of a dismal outlook, a little bit jaded but that's kind of what I've come to think from the show.

Televisionary: And is there any issue that stands out that you'd like to see the writers tackle?

Sommer: Oh,gosh, is there any issue that stands out? No, I feel like I don't think we're missing anything. I don't feel any stone is going unturned. And I love how--and any good television show should do this--any of these themes or issues are explored through the characters that we've already gotten to know. And, again, I know this is what TV is supposed to do but it is particularly exciting to be one of the sort of vessels through which things are explored. It's a very exciting process.

Televisionary: I've heard you're a huge fan of board games, so I'm wondering are there any new board games that you and the cast have been playing lately?

Sommer: No, actually a few of us have gotten more into video games this year. A couple of us picked up Xboxes and have been bringing them to the trailers and, whenever we have a free moment, we're kind of sitting in there playing video games. Which, in a way to me is sort of a step back. It's good and I am loving these video games, although, when I step back from what I do I kind of miss the old "Scoobyness" of a good, old-fashioned board game.

But this year, the one board game a couple of us have played that's brand new, it came out a few weeks ago, it's called Space Alert. It's a really nerdy, wonderful, stressful CD game that, as you play the game there's a a CD sort of with a robot voice telling you what to do. It sounds really, kind of like all those games that came out when we were in 5th grade but it's actually really, really intense. It's a great cooperative game.

Televisionary: Yet I love the idea of you in a bow tie playing Xbox.

Sommer: (Laughs) Someday when the show is over we will put out all the pictures we have of ourselves in costume doing very, very modern day things. Right now, obviously, we don't want to burst that bubble and it would be unfortunate to see Harry Crane with an Xbox controller in his hands, but someday it will be fun to let people in on what those trailers are like. It's a pretty fun place to work.

Televisonary: If the writers could have Harry do anything, no matter how crazy or out there, where would you like them to take the character?

Sommer: I kind of came up through comedy; that was where I started. I did a lot of improv when I was coming up through school and I've always sort of been tapped as a comedic guy. As much as I love Harry Crane and I don't wish harm on him, I am always interested to see how dark a character can get. Whatever it is, I don't know what the trigger would be, but I'd love to see Harry in the absolute depths of despair. That's something that would be interesting to get to play.

Televisionary: Well there was a rumor a few years back that he was supposed to be killed off in the first season.

Sommer: That is true. He was, as my understanding, supposed to commit suicide near the end of the first season. I am very grateful he didn't.

Televisionary: And a lot of fans are as well, I'm sure.

Sommer: (Laughs) I appreciate it!

Mad Men's third season begins Sunday, August 13th on AMC. Mad Men: Season Two is available on DVD for a suggested retail price of $49.98 but you can pick up a copy now in the Televisionary store for just $24.49.

Concrete and Conspiracies: "Torchwood: Children of Earth" Day Two

"We are coming tomorrow."

Never before have just a few words held such terrible import as they did at the end of the second installment of Torchwood: Children of Earth ("Day Two"), written by John Fay, in which the Torchwood team dealt with the aftermath of the explosion which ripped apart the Hub, their Cardiff base of operations, and their leader, Captain Jack Harkness (John Barrowman), and struggled to survive in the light of a massive political conspiracy that sought to silence them permanently.

But just why would PM Brian Green (Nicholas Farrell) and Permanent Secretary to the Home Office John Frobisher (Peter Capaldi) want to eliminate Torchwood from the playing field when they might just be the few people in the world who have any chance in hell at stopping The 456? Hmmm...

You've read my advance review of Torchwood: Children of Earth as a whole but now that "Day Two" has aired, we can discuss this installment in detail. (And, if you haven't yet watched the second episode of Torchwood: Children of Earth, beware: SPOILERS aplenty below here.)

"Day Two" had a lot to live up to, following so closely as it did on the heels of the killer opener to Torchwood: Children of Earth and I felt that it didn't quite match the level of tension and drama as the first installment. That said, the second act is always a tricky one and often compels characters to be more reactionary than they normally would.

It's no different here in "Day Two," where a separated Gwen (Eve Myles) and Ianto (David Gareth-Lloyd) must deal with the fallout from the destruction of the Hub and plot a course to safety on their own. For Gwen, it's a quick stop at home to grab her husband Rhys (Kai Owen) and head to London. But not before Gwen gets to kick ass on two separate occasions. The first: grabbed by some suspicious-looking EMT blokes, Gwen manages to pummel them into submission with a fire extinguisher in the back of the ambulance and then grabs their firearms. As a laser target hits her eye, Gwen jumps out of the ambulance and fires simultaneously with both her guns. (Fanboys everywhere must have leapt out of their seats as it was seriously hot.) The second: with Johnson's military strike force bearing down on her, Gwen calmly stands in the middle of her street and then fires right at their vehicle, taking out their wheels with a calculated air and without blinking an eyelash. Like I said, hot.

I'm loving that Rhys has a more integral role in the plot here and clearly seems to be along for the ride. Not only did he manage to secure them a ride to London (concealed in the back of a potato lorry) but Rhys also poses as an undertaker in order to gain access to the military facility where Jack is being kept. (More on that in a bit.) Throughout Torchwood's run, Rhys has often been painted as a bit of a liability for Gwen, a reminder of the fragile hold she has on normalcy and a target to be used against her. So it's only fitting then that Rhys has more to do here than just hold Gwen's bag (though he does that too in order to keep her trigger-finger handy); he's transformed from an outsider to a valuable member of the Torchwood team.

Ianto, meanwhile, kept on the low down and cautiously avoided making contact with anyone once he learned that Gwen was alive. With nowhere else to turn, he made contact with his sister Rhiannon (Katy Wix) via a letter secreted in their delivered newspaper and arranged a meet. While the objective was to obtain a laptop and a car, Ianto's meeting with Rhiannon revealed more of his own hidden backstory as they meet in a park where Ianto claims their father broke his leg as a boy. Was it an accident as Rhiannon claims? Or is Ianto accusing his dead father of assaulting him outright?

For a story about family bonds, it's interesting to see just how each of the main characters in Torchwood: Children of Earth reacts to the threat at hand. Ianto reconnects with his sister; Gwen tells Rhys about her pregnancy; Jack's daughter Alice (Lucy Cohu) nervously tries to reach Jack; Frobisher tells his daughters to keep their phones on all day even as he tries to tell his wife everything is fine.

But everything is not fine, not by a longshot. Besides for ordering Torchwood to be executed, Frobisher has a lot on his plate. Not least of which is new PA Lois Habiba (Cush Jumbo), who takes it upon herself to meet with Gwen and Rhys after they contact Frobisher's office. Given that it's only her second day, Lois is making some huge strides with treason, already breaking the Official Secrets Act after only 24 hours in Frobisher's employ. I have to give Lois credit: she's plucky. She not only meets with Gwen and Rhys but offers them valuable intel, maps to the facility where Jack is being held, and the knowledge that Frobisher wants them dead. All this plus a meal and tea and the very PA-like offering of salt and sugar. (Have I mentioned I already love Lois?)

And then there's the matter of the room which The 456 order constructed for their own purposes, sending the building instructions to Thames House via a concentrated burst of information over the 456 frequency. And, is just me or is the shady Mr. Dekker (Ian Gelder) way too into this entire process? The way that he blew on the glass as it filled up with poisonous gases made me very, very uncomfortable. While I don't think he's in league with The 456, his methods and behavior are not exactly on the up and up. I loved his speech to Frobisher about elected officials like the PM coming and going but the civil service, the "cockroaches of government" outlasting them, just like The 456.

Johnson (Liz May Bryce) proved herself even more cunning in "Day Two," realizing that even an internal blast couldn't kill Jack Harkness for good. The scene in which the body bag slowly filled as Jack's body regenerated itself was a thing of beauteous horror, even as it dawns on Johnson that, if killing Jack is no longer an option, containment will have to suffice. The look of horror on Jack's face as he realizes that Johnson is going to encase him in concrete was palpable and I actually squirmed in my seat as he was pelted with liquid concrete, a sentence of perpetual suffocation, death, and rebirth carried out. Stunning visual and a horrific testament to how far Johnson is willing to go to carry out her plans.

I loved that it was Ianto who managed to save Jack, using the nearby construction equipment to rip the concrete cell from the facility itself but the escape sequence after that seemed a little clunky and cheesy, a rare misstep in a mini-series that has been utterly grounded and believable. That they were able to outrace Johnson's goons in a slow-moving piece of equipment, move a lorry in front of the road and explode it, and drive off without fear of anyone catching them taxed my credibility a little. But still, it's a minor quibble for a story arc that has me on the edge of my seat and it enabled Ianto to free Jack from his prison by dropping the concrete chunk into a quarry.

I'm thrilled that the team is reunited by the end of "Day Two" (love that Jack fittingly just slings Rhys' coat over his shoulder rather than covering up his naked body) and it's just as well that they are, with The 456 promising their arrival tomorrow. Just what do The 456 want? What demands will they make when they arrive? How does it connect to their use of Earth's children as their unwitting spokespeople? And what exactly happened in 1965? Find out tonight...

On Day Three of Torchwood: Children of Earth, an ominous pillar of fire descends upon London; things get personal for the members of Torchwood when their loved ones are targeted.

Blank Pages and Executive Orders: "Torchwood: Children of Earth" Day One

No bones about it: Torchwood: Children of Earth certainly kicked off with a bang.

Written by Russell T. Davies, the first installment ("Day One") of the five-episode event--which comprises Torchwood's third season--certainly ramped up the tension and intrigue and brought the team to the brink of destruction even as they face their greatest threat yet, an alien incursion on Earth that seems to be using the planet's children as a sort of advance warning system.

Just who are The 456? What do they want? And why are they speaking through Earth's children? Those are the burning questions yet to answer. That is, if Torchwood survives long enough to get to the bottom of a political conspiracy that has ensnared the prime minister, Thames House, and a black ops organization with no qualms about killing whoever gets in their way.

You've read my advance review of Torchwood: Children of Earth as a whole but now that "Day One" has aired, we can discuss this installment in detail. (And, if you haven't yet watched the first episode of Torchwood: Children of Earth, beware: SPOILERS aplenty below here.)

As the start of Torchwood: Children of Earth, I thought Davies did a fantastic job of setting up the overarching plot and raising the stakes completely. While previous Torchwood excursions have included dangerous situations for the team, none have resulted in the outright destruction of the Hub, the team's underground Cardiff base of operations.

The explosion at the end of the episode--resulting from a bomb being implanted inside the stomach of an unconscious Captain Jack Harkness--was as shocking as it was thrilling, the announcement that nothing would be the same after this five-episode arc and that there were no sacred cows here. Everything is up for grabs: the team's base, their lives, the very fabric of society.

And Davies pulled a nice bait-and-switch with Rupesh Patanjali (Rik Makarem), the Anglo-Indian doctor who seemed a most likely candidate to join Torchwood after his introduction, especially as it was arranged that Jack and Ianto would meet Rupesh by chance at the hospital. What plays out is a nice callback to Gwen's introduction to the team after she stumbled onto something inexplicable and alien. But Rupesh isn't an idealistic recruit; rather, he's a member of the very same black ops task force that is sent to take care of Jack Harkness and several others on a blank page organized by the Permanent Secretary to the Home Office, John Frobisher (Peter Capaldi), a civil servant with knowledge of the so-called 456 and how their arrival ties into an incident in 1965 Scotland.

It's that knowledge that sets him on a path of destruction, targeting Jack Harkness and several others even as the Prime Minister Brian Green (Nicholas Farrell) denies all involvement in these matters. If there's blame to be assigned, it's going to fall on Frobisher and not the PM. But just what are they concealing? For one thing, it's connected to that 1965 incident, an incident which resulted in the disappearance of several children and which left one--Clement McDonald--an unwitting witness to all that passed.

Clem (Paul Copley) is now a grown-man living in an institution. His history and true name are shrouded in mystery but we learn that he was the sole survivor of what appears to be the 456's last visit to Earth in 1965.... and he has sensed their return--smelled it, more precisely--on the air for the last few months. He's also targeted by the black ops force overseen by the ruthless Johnson (Liz May Bryce) but he manages to slip out of the facility before he's nabbed.

That is, after he meets Gwen Cooper and comes clean about his real name and, in a rather surprising twist, tells her that she's pregnant. It's a stunning twist that's nicely juxtaposed with the threat facing the planet's children. In a world where aliens are seemingly controlling the planet's youth and speaking through them, is a pregnancy something to celebrate? Or rather to fear?

Eve Myles' performance with Clem was a study in underplaying a scene; she slyly wins over Clem's trust with her sweet gap-toothed smile and playful touches and reminds the viewers just why Gwen is the heart and soul of Torchwood. It's her innate kindness and sympathy that make her the perfect entry point to the series for viewers.

And families seem to be on the forefront of everyone's mind in this installment as Ianto goes to see his estranged sister Rhiannon (Katy Wix) in an effort to borrow his niece and nephew for testing (no dice there). Instead, their meeting becomes a heart-to-heart where Ianto comes clean about his relationship with Jack, a major turning point considering that Jack refuses to use the word "couple" to describe them. We also learn that Ianto broke off relations with his sister after the death of their father and that he doesn't tell her anything about himself. That does for his sexuality as much as it does for Torchwood itself. It's all secrets all the time for Ianto.

Jack, meanwhile, has a family of his own. Or namely, an adult daughter named Alice Carter (Lucy Cohu) and a grandson named Steven (Bear McCausland) with whom he maintains a fiction that he is Alice's brother. For her part, Alice has a natural suspicion of Jack and well as a need to protect her son from her father. It's not easy to explain why you are older than your father or why your father never seems to age while you get older and older. Suffice it to say: things are strained even before Jack turns up looking to borrow Steven for a little while.

Meanwhile, at Thames House, there's a new PA in Frobisher's office named Lois Habiba (Cush Jumbo) who stumbles onto the fact that her new boss is dealing with an extraterrestrial threat and furtively uses the login of Frobisher's PA Bridget Spears (Susan Brown) to uncover the execution order on Jack Harkness. It might just be me but she seems to have the makings of a crack Torchwood recruit and she's perfectly positioned to help the team, no?

Johnson herself is terrifyingly efficient. The way that she called out "sides!" when Rupesh attempted to flee after he shot Jack (and realized that Johnson was going to have him killed) was stunningly cold. She's a worthy adversary for the Torchwood team and is just as dogged in her pursuit of the government's agenda as the Torchwood team is in stopping alien threats. Could it be that they're outnumbered and outwitted this time?

Best line of the evening: "Big science fiction super-base. Honestly!" - Gwen on what's inside the Hub's relatively unassuming exterior.

What did you think of tonight's installment? What do the 456 want? Why are they coming back? Why must Jack Harkness and Torchwood be eliminated? And just what does the 456's latest message--"We are coming back"--actually mean? Find out tonight...

On Day Two of Torchwood: Children of Earth, the fractured Torchwood team is forced to go underground as the government attempts to hunt them down and eliminate them.