BuzzFeed: "A Girls Lover And Hater Debate The Season 3 Premiere"

The always buzzed about HBO comedy returned tonight and BuzzFeed’s Entertainment Editorial Director Jace Lacob, who’s looked forward to watching every episode of the series, and Deputy Entertainment Editor Jaimie Etkin, who’s begrudgingly watched every episode of the series, discussed the back-to-back episodes. They agreed on one thing. Maybe two.

At BuzzFeed, you can read my latest feature, "A Girls Lover And Hater Debate The Season 3 Premiere," in which Jaimie Etkin and I hotly debate the two-episode third season premiere of HBO's Girls.

SPOILER ALERT if you have not yet seen the Season 3 premiere of Girls!

Jaimie: I am simultaneously excited and nervous about this. My Girls rage is about to become public knowledge. I mean, I don’t have negative feels about Lena Dunham as a human or woman, but her show just makes me really frustrated. HOWEVER, I must say it was eye-opening to see how people talk to her, as exhibited by the TCA debacle last week. Dunham handled Tim Molloy’s awfully approached question about Hannah’s nudity very gracefully and of all the things I find unrealistic about the show, the nudity isn’t an issue for me. Let’s be honest: Pants are the enemy.

Jace: HA. I’m not bothered by the nudity at all within Girls. (Randomly, I’m listening to Robyn’s “Dancing On My Own” right now, I should add.) To me, it’s an integral part of the emotional reality of the show; Hannah’s willingness to bare herself is not at odds with her interest in baring her emotions to everyone around her. And the scene in the season opener, where she rolls over to answer Jessa’s call, makes so much more sense that she wouldn’t be dressed; there’s more verisimilitude because of it. Why are people still so bothered by the notion that she’s not dressed, three seasons in?

Jaimie: (Sure. “Randomly.”) Because Hannah doesn’t have the conventional Hollywood body type. And as a twenty-something woman who doesn’t either, I appreciate that. That said, I have to be honest and say, that I think it’s incongruous with her very insecure character to be wearing bikinis (as we see in the trailer), some of those short shorts, mesh tops (::cough::), and the like. That, to me, doesn’t make sense for her character. But in the comfort of her own home, it’s very honest to see her not wearing clothes because, unlike in most shows, even on cable, we see someone get out of bed with their partner and put on clothes to answer the phone or something similar, which is just not realistic.

Jace: It’s the magic of the L-shaped sheet that we see so often in television shows! To me, it’s refreshing that Hannah, for her hang-ups in other areas, is very comfortable with her sexuality and her nudity. We should celebrate that, not denigrate it. But the show itself, to me, is refreshing in the honesty of how it handles the dynamic of female, twentysomething relationships. The Hannah-Marnie dynamic — with its embedded animosity and resentments — is endlessly fascinating to me. As is that between Hannah and Jessa. I loved the scene between them at the end of the second episode: anger mixed with relief.

Continue reading at BuzzFeed...

The Daily Beast: "James Gandolfini the Great"

James Gandolfini, the hulking star of HBO's acclaimed The Sopranos, has died. My piece on the legacy the actor and producer leaves behind.

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "James Gandolfini the Great," my appreciation of the late, great Sopranos star James Gandolfini, who passed away yesterday at age 51 while traveling in Italy.

HBO has confirmed the unexpected death of actor and producer James Gandolfini, who passed away at age 51 while traveling in Italy. At press time, the cause of his death was unclear, with several outlets reporting a heart attack or a "sudden stroke." He was due to appear at the Taormina Film Festival in Sicily, where he was slated to paricipate in a panel discussion with director Gabriele Muccino.

While Gandolfini appeared in countless film and television roles, ranging from comedies (like Armando Iannucci's wickedly skewering Washington satire In the Loop) to hard-hitting dramas like Kathryn Bigelow's Zero Dark Thirty, it was his visceral turn as deeply troubled mobster Tony Soprano, the pater familias of a New Jersey crime family and a domestic one, on HBO's The Sopranos, which won him accolades from critics and viewers alike. During the drama's acclaimed six-season run, Gandolfini would win three Emmy awards for Best Actor for The Sopranos (he was nominated six times), widely regarded as one of the best television shows ever to air—it was recently named the best written show in history by the Writers Guild of America—and one that ushered in a new Golden Age for television.

"We're all in shock and feeling immeasurable sadness at the loss of a beloved member of our family," said HBO in a prepared statement. "He was a special man, a great talent, but more importantly a gentle and loving person who treated everyone no matter their title or position with equal respect. He touched so many of us over the years with his humor, his warmth, and his humility. Our hearts go out to his wife and children during this terrible time. He will be deeply missed by all of us."

With his death, Hollywood has lost one of its finest veteran actors. With The Sopranos, Gandolfini delivered a searing and deeply complex performance that captured the rage, sorrow, and frustation of the modern American male. As played by Gandolfini, Tony Soprano was full of contradictions, a complex man whose struggles with depression and panic attacks humanized him despite the violence he perpetrated on those around him. (It was hard not to love him when even his desperate, harried mother wanted him dead.) Prone to violence, Tony Soprano represented the unfettered darker impulses of the id, while also remaining intriguingly relatable. Even as the character plotted for control of a New Jersey criminal enterprise, he struggled to keep his own family together.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Game of Thrones: Will the HBO Series Catch Up to George R.R. Martin's Books?"

Game of Thrones may catch up with George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire novels. So what will HBO do if the inevitable does occur? My take on the show's options.

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest post, "Game of Thrones: Will the HBO Series Catch Up to George R.R. Martin's Books?" in which I react to Entertainment Weekly's story on whether Game of Thrones will meet up with (or surpass) the progress of Martin's in-progress novels.

After the horror and shock of last week's Red Wedding episode, Season 3 of Game of Thrones ended rather quietly.

There were no dragons being born from ancient eggs placed upon a funeral pyre, nor white walkers marching en masse for the brothers of the Night's Watch. Instead, Daenerys Stormborn (Emilia Clarke) is raised above the shoulders of the slaves she freed from bondage and the episode ("Mhysa") more or less set up some new conflicts and story for the fourth season, which should arrive sometime in 2014.

Putting that aside, however, is a more pressing concern about the shape of this massive narrative, particularly as showrunners David Benioff and D.B. Weiss are dealing with "a ticking clock" in the form of the show catching up with George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire novels. Martin is hard at work at the series' sixth book, entitled The Winds of Winter, but there is every indication that the HBO fantasy drama's narrative could either catch up to Martin or surpass him altogether.

This trepidation is something that has been keenly felt by the novel series' readers since HBO's Game of Thrones began in 2011: what happens when the television show gets ahead of the novels that it's adapting? It's a fear that HBO seemed to shrug off, perhaps thinking that they'd deal with that situation when they had to. Unfortunately, that time is soon.
HBO programming president Michael Lombardo has finally acknowledged that it's a valid concern. "I finally understand fans' fear—which I didn't a couple years ago: What if the storytelling catches up to the books?" he told Entertainment Weekly. "Let's all hope and pray that's not going to be a problem."

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "The Red Wedding: HBO’s Game of Thrones Reveals Its Latest Twist"

Yes, that actually did just happen. My take on the latest shocking twist on HBO’s Game of Thrones, and why the disturbing outcome of the Red Wedding was crucial for the series. Spoilers abound!

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "The Red Wedding: HBO’s Game of Thrones Reveals Its Latest Twist," in which I offer my take on this week's shocking episode of Game of Thrones ("The Rains of Castamere") and why the twist was necessary for the longevity and narrative stakes of the series.

And they partook of his salt and bread.

Oaths are meant to be sacred: after all, a man is only as good as his word. But a world in which oaths are meaningless and void is a terrifying place without logic, justice, or order. On this week’s episode of HBO’s Game of Thrones (“The Rains of Castamere”), we see the ramifications of breaking one’s word. Just as Robb Stark (Richard Madden) betrayed his vow to Walder Frey (David Bradley), promising to marry his daughter in exchange for Frey bannermen, so too does Walder Frey betray the most sacred oath of all, that of hospitality.

This week’s gut-wrenching episode hammered home the dramatic stakes at play within HBO’s Game of Thrones, one that perfectly captures the bloodshed of George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire novels and their underlying notion that no one is ever truly safe. That goes for kings and queens, mothers and children, the old and the unborn.

In a series that’s already rife with whiplash-inducing plot twists, the Red Wedding is one of the most unsettling, horrific, and terrifying moments, not least because it lulls the audience into a false sense of safety. By eating Walder Frey’s bread and salt, the Starks engage in the age-old custom of hospitality. To betray one’s guests in one’s home is a most grievous sin, yet that’s just what Walder Frey does to enact a most terrible vengeance against the King in the North and his clan, murdering Robb, Catelyn (Michelle Fairley), and their men at the wedding feast, transforming this bawdy celebration into a bloodbath from which no one escapes.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Family Tree Brings Christopher Guest’s Mockumentary Style to HBO"

He pioneered the mockumentary on film. Now Christopher Guest is bringing his latest comedy, HBO’s Family Tree, to a TV landscape crowded with the format. My take on whether he succeeds.

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Family Tree Brings Christopher Guest’s Mockumentary Style to HBO," in which I review HBO's latest comedy, Family Tree, which begins Sunday evening, and which stars Chris O'Dowd (The IT Crowd) and hails from the fertile mind of co-creator Christopher Guest (Best in Show, Waiting for Guffman, A Mighty Wind).

Over the last few decades, the mockumentary format has become almost totally synonymous with Christopher Guest, the writer/director (and often actor) best known for films such as This Is Spinal Tap, Best in Show, Waiting for Guffman, A Mighty Wind, and For Your Consideration. Each film—to varying success—mined the documentary format for laughs, setting up its eccentric characters as the butts of the joke ... or the only ones in on it.

It’s no surprise, then, that Guest would eventually seek to bring his brand of comedy to television, which has had significant success with the format: numerous comedies, from Modern Family to The Office and Parks and Recreation, have embraced the single-camera mockumentary format, allowing for characters to engage in “talking heads” segments in which they speak directly to the audience via an unseen film crew. It’s through this technique that characters are able to comment on what the viewer has just seen or will see, an act that creates an instantaneous and perpetual sense of intimacy. That rapport, in essence, sets up the audience as an additional, unseen character in the room, removing the narrative distance between the action and the viewer at home.

With Guest and Jim Piddock’s semi-improvised genealogy comedy Family Tree, which begins its eight-episode season this Sunday evening on HBO, the television mockumentary format may be reaching oversaturation. But for Family Tree, the result is nonetheless appealing, what I like to call “tea-cozy television”—nothing too precious or too taxing, but comforting to watch all the same.

The show, which features a slew of familiar faces from Guest’s previous film work, revolves around sad sack Tom Chadwick (Bridesmaids’ Chris O’Dowd), who has, in rapid succession, lost both his job and his girlfriend. Cuckolded and on the dole, Tom flounders until he receives an unusual bequest from his Great-Aunt Victoria: a mysterious box containing ephemera from his family’s complicated history. Rather than see the box as full of rubbish, he chooses to see it as an invitation to a quest: to reconstruct his family tree and come to terms with the Chadwick clan’s rather checkered past (and, one imagines, his own in the process).

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Game of Thrones Season 3 for Dummies"

HBO's fantasy series Game of Thrones returns Sunday for a third season. Can’t remember the difference between a wight and a white walker? Jace Lacob's glossary explains all! (Plus, read our advance review of Season 3.)

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Game of Thrones Season 3 for Dummies," the third in an ongoing series that each year brings you up to speed (and reminds you of what you may have forgotten) about the people, places, and recurring motifs from the immersive HBO drama (and George R. R. Martin's massive A Song of Ice and Fire novel series), which returns Sunday, March 31.

In its riveting second season, Game of Thrones—based on George R.R. Martin’s behemoth A Song of Ice and Fire series and adapted by executive producers David Benioff and D.B. Weiss—brought the war for the Iron Throne to a staggering climax with the amazing Battle of the Blackwater, a hugely dramatic set piece that found the naval forces of Stannis Baratheon (Stephen Dillane) attacking King’s Landing, only to be cast back into the sea, thanks to some ingenuity from Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage).

The highly anticipated third season of HBO’s Game of Thrones begins on Sunday at 9 p.m., kicking off another season of treachery, romance, conspiracies, dragons and, um, snowy blue-eyed zombie creatures. If you haven’t read Martin’s hefty novels, the world that the show inhabits can be an intimidating place without the maps, family trees and lineages contained within the novels’ vast appendices. And Season 3 of Game of Thrones is no exception, introducing a slew of new characters, settings and plots, each requiring a whole new knowledge base.

As we did for Season 1 and Season 2, The Daily Beast delves deep into the first four episodes of Game of Thrones Season 3, Martin’s third novel (A Storm of Swords) and beyond to bring you up to speed on everything you need to know, from Astapor to Winterfell. Consider it both a refresher on events from the second season and a constant source of information and background to come back to as you watch the third season.

WARNING: A note on spoilers: I discuss many plot details from Season 2 below. But I do not spoil specifics from Season 3, unless you count knowing settings and themes and characters as spoilers. In which case, spoiler alerts!

Astapor: A city set upon Slaver’s Bay, and a nexus for a thriving slave trade and a huge economic gap between the masters and their servants. It is home to the training grounds for a rare breed of slave-warriors. (See: Unsullied, The.)

“Bear and the Maiden Fair, The”: A traditional, if exceedingly ribald, song that is quite popular throughout Westeros. One of its verses: “A bear there was, a bear, a bear!/All black and brown, and covered with hair!/The bear! The bear!/Oh, come, they said, oh come to the fair!/The fair? Said he, but I'm a bear!/All black, and brown, and covered with hair!” (It is also reportedly the title of the seventh episode of Season 3 of Game of Thrones.)

Blackfish, The: The nickname of Ser Brynden Tully (Clive Russell), the uncle of Lady Catelyn Stark (Michelle Fairley) and Lady Lysa Arryn (Kate Dickie). A Tully by birth, he has taken a black fish as his personal sigil, an inside joke that plays upon the Tully’s fish sigil.

Brotherhood Without Banners, The: A motley group of rebels and outlaws who were once part of a team sent by Eddard Stark (Sean Bean) to capture Gregor Clegane (Ian Whyte), a.k.a. The Mountain. But after the deaths of Ned and Robert Baratheon (Mark Addy), they found themselves adrift without someone to whom they could pledge their loyalty. (Hence, no banners.) Now, they claim allegiance to no individual faction in the War of Five Kings, instead keeping the peace by their own vigilante methods. (Can also refer to real-life fans of George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire novel series.)

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

Newsweek: "Here Be Dragons: Season 3 of HBO's Game of Thrones Reviewed"

Based on a 1,000-page novel, the third season of HBO’s ‘Game of Thrones’ is the best—and most complex—one we’ve seen yet.

In this week's issue of Newsweek (and online at The Daily Beast), you can read my latest feature, "Here Be Dragons: Season 3 of HBO's Game of Thrones Reviewed," in which I review the first four episodes of Season 3 of HBO's Game of Thrones, which might just be the best season yet.

When it launched in 2011, HBO’s fantasy drama Game of Thrones quickly became part of the global collective consciousness, an often brutally violent and staggeringly beautiful series that offered viewers an immersive television experience.

Based on the gargantuan bestselling novel series A Song of Ice and Fire by George R.R. Martin, Game of Thrones depicts the bloody and vicious battle for control of the Iron Throne in the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros, a fictional world that bears a resemblance to medieval Europe ... if Europe had once been the home of magic, dragons, and a long-slumbering ancient evil. However, unlike most fantasy stories, Game of Thrones presents a complex morality that is far more nuanced than simply the forces of good vs. evil. Here, good men are killed while the wicked are rewarded; innocence suffers in the face of depravity; and everyone has a personal agenda to advance, a knife hidden behind the most beatific of smiles.

Season 3 of Game of Thrones kicks off on HBO on March 31 with 10 episodes that are based on Martin’s perhaps most beloved novel, A Storm of Swords, a hefty 1,000-page tome that is by far the most complicated and intricate of the five books in the series to date. It is a sweeping saga that flits between dozens of narrators and across continents—from the sultry heat of Slaver’s Bay to the raw iciness beyond the Wall—as alliances are formed and broken, lives taken, and conspiracies hatched.

ranslating such a monumental work of fiction to the screen is no easy feat, and executive producers David Benioff and D.B. Weiss have done an incredible job thus far in balancing the needs of diehard fans, the demands of the story, and a sense of accessibility to those viewers who don’t detect the nuances between the Dothraki and High Valyrian tongues. Adaptation, particularly of an ongoing series, is a fluid, mercurial thing, and the show’s executive producers have proven largely capable of shifting content, paring it down, and inventing new material in order to make the narrative fit within the confines of a weekly television series.

Season 3, which will depict roughly the first half of Martin’s A Storm of Swords, will present Benioff and Weiss with their greatest challenge yet, as both sides attempt to pick up the pieces after the last season’s climactic Battle of the Blackwater. The first four episodes of the new season, provided to critics ahead of its premiere, demonstrate a canny ability to fuse the literary with the visual, resulting in an exhilarating and magnificent thing of beauty, particularly in those scenes that make full use of locations as diverse as Iceland, Croatia, and Morocco.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Girls Gets Graphic"

This week’s episode of Girls graphically depicted the results of a male character’s climax. Why the scene has outraged some, and why it’s a watershed moment for the HBO comedy.

Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Girls Gets Graphic," in which I write about Girls, viewer responses, graphic content, and why THAT scene from this week's episode was a watershed moment for the Lena Dunham comedy.

HBO’s Girls has always been a lightning rod for critical reaction, whether it be allegations of nepotism, privilege, or racism. It’s impossible to imagine a week going by without someone, somewhere, having an adverse reaction to the Lena Dunham-created comedy.

And that’s okay: art is meant to trigger emotional responses. I’d far rather watch a television show that stirred up feelings within its viewers—that challenged them to watch something complicated and often uncomfortable—than a show whose main goal was simply to please the most people, across all demographic swaths, week after week.

Girls is the most definitely the former rather than the latter. It’s a show that revels in its own complexity, in the often-unlikable natures of its characters, in the comedy of the awkward that follows. This week’s episode (“On All Fours”)—written by Lena Dunham and Jenni Konner and directed by Dunham—expectedly led to all sorts of responses from its viewers, many of which was of the outraged variety.

Joe Flint at the Los Angeles Times yesterday penned a reaction to this week’s episode of Girls, focusing in particular on the graphic sex scene between Adam (Adam Driver) and his new girlfriend, Natalia (Shiri Appleby), which was challenging to watch: after making her crawl to his bedroom on all fours, he proceeded to engage in some disconnected, rough sex with her and then finished himself off on her chest.

“But Sunday's episode was graphic even for those fans used to seeing creator and star Lena Dunham's no-holds-barred approach to story-telling,” wrote Flint. “This was not a first for cable TV, or the movies. An episode of HBO's Sex and the City showed fluid but played it for laughs, as did a well-known scene featuring Cameron Diaz in the comedy There's Something About Mary.”

“However, this time it was a jarring end to a violent and hard-to-watch scene,” he continued. “Even theatrical movies with sexually explicit material and adult pay-per-view channels typically steer clear of such displays, especially if it's not for comic relief."

Flint is right in saying that this was not “a first” for cable television. But he (and an HBO spokeswoman quoted in the story) seem to have a short memory, as HBO’s short-lived drama Tell Me You Love Me featured an even more graphic scene involving “fluids” that was most definitely not played for comic relief.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Girls: Season 2 of HBO’s Lena Dunham Comedy Soars"

HBO’s Girls returns for a second season on Sunday night. I review the first four episodes of Season 2 of the Lena Dunham-created comedy, which "captures the quicksilver magic of Dunham at her best."

Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Girls: Season 2 of HBO’s Lena Dunham Comedy Soars," in which I review the first four episodes of Season 2 of HBO's Girls, the most polarizing television show of 2012.

The most polarizing show of 2012 was HBO’s Girls, which revolves around the lives of four 20-something women orbiting each other in Brooklyn. The Lena Dunham–created comedy elicited a love-hate relationship with premium cable audiences. You either loved the bravery of the show, its incredible sense of voice and time, and its unrepentant navel-gazing attitude ... or you loathed it.

In its first season, the show received various criticisms of racism, elitism, and, er, hipsterism. The amount of ink devoted to tearing down both Dunham and Girls was shocking to me, particularly as much of it emerged from those who hadn’t actually watched the show or from those who failed to see that Dunham’s Hannah Horvath wasn’t meant to be held up as a paragon of virtue, but rather a flawed, sheltered narcissist whose greatest enemy was herself. The girls of Girls aren’t meant to represent all women, or even all 20-something women in Brooklyn. The show represents a very specific snapshot of a very specific cultural subset existing at this very second in time. As such, it is part anthropological record, part comedy, and part tragedy.

The hotly anticipated second season of Girls, which returns to HBO on Sunday, builds on the strengths of its stellar first season and captures the quicksilver magic of Dunham at her best, with the first four episodes supplying a mighty kick to the heart.

[Warning: Minor spoilers ahead!] Yes, the girls and guys of Girls are back, though their relationships, tested by events at the tail end of Season 1, remain tantalizingly fractured: Hannah is no longer with Adam (Adam Driver), her quirky, conflicted, body-conscious boyfriend, though she is caring for him while he recuperates from his car accident. Immobilized and dependent upon Hannah for everything except sex, their dynamic is a pale reflection of the sparks they kicked off last year. Hannah, meanwhile, is involved with a black Republican played by Community’s Donald Glover, and their sexual chemistry manifests itself in a playful, easy way. His inclusion here seems calculated to dispel the charges of racism leveled against the show, depicting a Brooklyn that is less lily white than the canvas shown in Season 1. But I’m glad to see that Dunham doesn’t make Glover’s Sandy a stereotype: he’s sweet but conservative, easygoing but also as rigid in his political thinking as Hannah is.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Why Comedy Writers Love HBO's Game of Thrones"

Game of Thrones is beloved by viewers and critics alike. But the Emmy-nominated HBO fantasy drama is also a surprising favorite in the writers’ rooms of TV comedies around Hollywood. I talk to sitcom writers about why they’re obsessed with the sex-and-magic-laden drama, and how the show informs their own narratives.

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Why Comedy Writers Love HBO's Game of Thrones," in which I talk to writers from Parks and Recreation, Modern Family, and Community about why they love HBO's Game of Thrones, nominated for an Emmy Award for Best Drama.

Fox’s upcoming sitcom The Mindy Project, created by and starring Mindy Kaling, deconstructs the romantic comedy fantasies of its lead character, an ob-gyn whose disappointment in the dating world stems from her obsessive viewing of Nora Ephron films.

At the Television Critics Association Summer Press Tour in July, Kaling was candid about the role that When Harry Met Sally and other rom-coms would play on the show, but also revealed the show might feature shoutouts to HBO’s Game of Thrones, which is nominated for an Emmy Award for Best Drama.

“My writing staff, they are just obsessed with Game of Thrones,” Kaling said. “The show could just have Game of Thrones references: dragons, stealing eggs of dragon babies… You might see a lot—more than your average show—of Game of Thrones references.”

Yet the writers of The Mindy Project are not the only scribes who have fallen under the spell of the ferocious Game of Thrones, which depicts the struggle for control of the Iron Throne of the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros.

“It’s a violent, strange show with lots of sex in it,” Kaling went on to say.

Writers’ rooms—where the plots of television shows are “broken,” in industry parlance—often revolve around discussions of other shows, particularly ones that have a significant hold on the cultural conversation, whether it be Breaking Bad, Mad Men, or Homeland.

“A comedy writers’ room is like a really great dinner party with the smartest and funniest people you’ve ever met,” Parks and Recreation co-executive producer Alexandra Rushfield wrote in an email. Their typical conversations? “The presidential campaign. Whatever articles or books people are reading. Taking wagers on crazy statistics, like how much all the casts in the world combined might weigh. General heckling of co-workers.”

And TV shows such as Game of Thrones that viewers can debate endlessly. Modern Family executive producer Danny Zuker likened Game of Thrones to Lost in terms of the volume of discussion and passionate debate that the show engenders. It’s certainly immersive: five massive novels, two seasons of television, maps, online forums, family trees. Game of Thrones is a show that provokes—or even forces—viewer evaluation, deconstruction, and discussion.

“Many writers that I know are into it,” said Zuker over lunch on the Fox lot. “The setting of the world probably appeals to that nerd that is in most writers… I never played Dungeons & Dragons, but I get why the most disaffected kids who are intelligent and creative did, because in that world you could be powerful…. I basically just described comedy writers.”

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "Best Drama Race: Will Mad Men Make History?"

The race for the Emmy Awards’ top drama prize is fierce (hello, Downton!).

Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Best Drama Race: Will Mad Men Make History?" in which I assess the field to see whether Mad Men will make history with a fifth win.

Can Mad Men could do the impossible on Sunday and win a fifth Emmy Award for Best Drama? After walking away with the statuette four years in a row, all eyes are on AMC’s Emmy darling, which could make history with a five-time win.

Currently, Mad Men shares the record for most Best Drama wins with such notable programs as Hill Street Blues, The West Wing, and L.A. Law, all of which were crowned victors four times. But a win at Sunday’s 64th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards would make Mad Men the undisputed drama record-holder, no small feat for a show that is about to go into its sixth season—reportedly the show’s penultimate—and whose loyal viewers are considerably dwarfed by HBO’s and Showtime’s entries.

Mad Men’s fifth season found Don Draper (Jon Hamm) rediscovering himself as a newlywed after his surprising proposal to his secretary, Megan (Jessica Paré); Pete Campbell (Vincent Kartheiser) facing his mortality; Joan Harris (Christina Hendricks) selling herself to become a partner; Peggy Olsen (Elisabeth Moss) leaving the firm; and poor Lane Pryce (Jared Harris) taking his own life in the office. Often polarizing, Season 5 of Mad Men was a challenging and gut-wrenching season of transformation for its characters, and a lyrical and haunting experience for many viewers.

It’s Mad Men’s toughest road to the Emmys podium. This year’s competition is fierce; so fierce, it seems, that there isn’t a single broadcast network drama competing for the top prize. (Stalwart CBS drama The Good Wife is the most obvious omission.) Instead, Mad Men’s competitors come almost entirely from cable, with AMC sibling Breaking Bad, HBO’s Game of Thrones and Boardwalk Empire, and Showtime’s Homeland all represented.

And then there’s Downton Abbey, the British costume drama that transformed itself into a phenomenon this year. The Julian Fellowes–created show—which depicts the lives of the wealthy Crawley family and their servants in the post-Edwardian era—airs on PBS’s venerable Masterpiece, the 41-year-old anthology series that has suddenly become a mainstream success story thanks to its wise and prescient investment in Downton.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "TV's New Prostitute Fixation"

When Mad Men's Joan Harris (Christina Hendricks) received her indecent proposal this season on the AMC period drama, viewers were sharply divided about her actions within the controversial and polarizing episode. But Hendricks' Harris is emblematic of a larger trend within television this year: the virtual proliferation of prostitutes within scripted dramas.

Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "TV's New Prostitute Fixation," in which I examine the sudden proliferation of prostitutes on television, from Game of Thrones and Crimson Petal to True Blood and Copper, and what may be behind the trend.

On BBC America’s period drama Copper, which premiered on Sunday, the first person encountered by Kevin Corcoran, the 19th century New York City policeman played by Tom Weston-Jones, is a child prostitute who promptly offers to “pleasure” him in exchange for coin.

No more than 10 years old, Copper’s Annie (Kiara Glasco) acts as a conduit to a story arc about child killers, child prostitutes, and righteous vengeance. Within Copper, a whorehouse serves as one of the main backdrops for the Tom Fontana and Will Rokos-created drama, a sexually laced boozer where the cops come to unwind after a hard day chasing (and often killing) criminals. Franka Potente’s Eva oversees the establishment, counting money when she’s not indulging in some hot sex with Weston-Jones’ Corcoran. Across town, a French madam, Contessa Popadou (Inga Cadranel), rules her brothel with an iron fist sans velvet glove, indulging rich gentlemen’s tastes for young flesh.

Given that prostitution may be the world’s oldest profession, it’s no surprise that a show about the seedy underbelly of 19th century Manhattan’s Five Points would contain a whore or four, but the presence of prostitutes—which perhaps owes a debt to HBO’s Deadwood—isn’t limited to Copper. From True Blood and Game of Thrones to Justified, Hell on Wheels, and next month’s British import The Crimson Petal and the White, there’s a virtual proliferation of prostitutes on television right now, one that positions the women somewhere on the spectrum between victim and empowered hero. But while some of them represent financially attainable forbidden fruit (it is surely no coincidence that several recent TV hookers are named “Eva”), the omnipresence of these prostitutes underpins a disturbing development within real-life society.

That trend isn’t limited to literal whores either. In this season’s most controversial and polarizing episode of Mad Men, Christina Hendricks’ Joan Harris sold herself to a client in order to secure a seat at the table with the male partners. It’s within stories such as these that the viewer is given a glimpse into both the struggle of women to move beyond being objects of sexual desire, beautiful things to be owned, and the viewer fantasy of transformation that these situations engender.

There’s a distinct prurience to the appearance of the prostitute within a narrative. The shows mentioned above are all created by men (though it’s worth noting that The Crimson Petal and the White, based on the novel by Michael Faber, was adapted by Lucinda Coxon), so it’s hardly surprising that the male gaze would be turned on women whose job it is to service men sexually.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "HBO’s The Newsroom: Aaron Sorkin’s Woman Problem"

HBO's The Newsroom transforms its female characters into hysterics and fools. In a critics’ conversation, Maureen Ryan and I dissect the woman problem embedded in Aaron Sorkin’s troubling drama.

Over at The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "HBO’s The Newsroom: Aaron Sorkin’s Woman Problem," a critics' conversation in which The Huffington Post's Maureen Ryan and I explore the women problem within The Newsroom.

In certain circles, HBO’s latest drama, The Newsroom, from creator Aaron Sorkin (The West Wing, The Social Network), has been the galvanizing event of the summer, eliciting no shortage of strong responses both pro and con. In a critics’ conversation reprinted below, The Daily Beast’s Jace Lacob and the Huffington Post’s Maureen Ryan delve into the troubling issue of women within the HBO drama.

MAUREEN RYAN: One of the bigger problems with The Newsroom is that so many scenes involve men setting women straight, men supervising women, a man teaching a woman how to use email (and the woman getting it spectacularly wrong regardless), a hapless woman seesawing between two different men, etc. It’s not that I can't buy Will McAvoy, Jeff Daniels’s lead character, as a fully realized human being, but it’s pretty clear that the show thinks he is right, admirable, or brave most, if not all, of the time. 



We’re supposed to believe that MacKenzie McHale (Emily Mortimer) covered conflicts in the Middle East and won multiple awards for her work, yet she doesn’t understand how email works? She can’t get through a meeting without knocking over a poster? But one of the most troubling things is the way she’s used to prop up Will’s martyr complex: she cheated on him, and yet she clearly still adores him, despite the way he repeatedly berates her. She is the Woman Who Done the Man Wrong yet can’t quit him (really?). He’s clearly our hero, and she’s capable on occasion, but as ditzy and needy as the show needs her to be whenever it suits Sorkin. 



JACE LACOB: It’s hard to know what’s more infuriating: that MacKenzie is written as though she hasn’t even heard of a war zone or that she’s presented as alternately hysterical and incompetent. Her email gaffe in the second episode is unbelievable and galling. If you’re thinking, well, who hasn’t sent an errant email? Why does it have to be some symbol of misogyny? Then picture a male character in Sorkin’s world who doesn’t know the difference between the “*” and “s” keys on his BlackBerry. Impossible. 



The pratfalls hardly help solidify her character, nor does the near-constant yelling that Mortimer’s MacKenzie indulges in. She’s strident in a way that Sorkin refuses to let McAvoy be. Where he’s ambitious and visionary, she’s shrill. In fact, The Newsroom seems to relish putting loud women in their place or to render them helpless and histrionic. If the message of News Night is “we can do better,” surely that can apply to Sorkin as well here?

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

The Daily Beast: "True Blood Season Five: Has HBO’s Vampire Drama Lost Its Bite?"

HBO’s True Blood returns on Sunday. Over at The Daily Beast, I review the first four episodes of the fifth season and ask: what happened to the vampire drama?

You can read my latest feature, "True Blood Season Five: Has HBO’s Vampire Drama Lost Its Bite?", in which I examine the first four episodes of Season Five of True Blood and write, "The first four episodes of Season Five… reflect what’s wrong with the most recent seasons of the HBO drama: they lack focus." I also explore how the lack of baseline normalcy--and the sense that everyone in Bon Temps is somehow "special"--has robbed the show of dramatic stakes.

HBO’s popular True Blood has never been known as a slow-burn drama. Instead of advancing the plot minutely from episode to episode, the Southern Gothic vampire drama has, during its four seasons to date, zoomed at a breakneck speed, hurtling toward its cliffhanger ending each year at a maximum velocity.

While that can rev up viewers’ adrenaline levels, it can also lead to severe narrative whiplash, which is exactly what has happened to the show, which begins its fifth season on Sunday evening. (It is also the final season under the eye of showrunner Alan Ball, who will depart at the end of the season to focus on his new Cinemax show, Banshee, launching in 2013.)

The first four episodes of Season 5 recently sent out to critics reflect what’s wrong with the most recent seasons of the HBO drama: they lack focus. The plot, which is based in part on Charlaine Harris’s novels, zigzags in so many different directions that it often seems as though there are no less than 10 separate television shows existing side by side within True Blood. While the early seasons of the show wisely focused on a few main characters—such as Anna Paquin’s telepathic waitress Sookie Stackhouse; brooding vampires Bill Compton (Stephen Moyer) and Eric Northman (Alexander Skarsgård); Sookie’s hotheaded best friend Tara Thornton (Rutina Wesley); her secretive boss Sam (Sam Trammell); and her horndog brother Jason (Ryan Kwanten), along with a few other central players—the show’s success at creating vivid and engaging supporting characters has also been its downfall.

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

Valar Morghulis: Thoughts on the Season Finale of Game of Thrones

Everything ends.

Life, love, and even dynasties: nothing lasts forever. They all turn to dust, a charnel cloud of smoke, reducing even the stones of a fortress that has stood for thousands of years to ash. Everything crumbles, everything rots, and everything eventually ends.

And even this, Season Two of Game of Thrones.

The season finale ("Valar Morgulis"), written by David Benioff and D. B. Weiss and directed by Alan Taylor, concluded the second season of Game of Thrones with a powerful episode that built up on the magnificent set piece of the Battle of the Blackwater that last week's episode provided. Despite the fact that, after such a momentous event, the final episode could have felt more like a denouement than a riveting installment in itself, "Valar Morgulis" instead further teased out more tension, drama, and dread, offering an ending to the season that was flooded with possibility, both of life and and of death... but ultimately of change.

While there was no drought of action, this week's episode also offered a reflection upon about perception, deception, and illusion, diving deep into the way in which we perceive ourselves, our surroundings, our failures and our strengths. Providing a strong throughline for the season finale is the notion of the difference between looking and truly seeing, peeling away the artifice to reveal the truth below.

It's a theme that plays out in all of the many storylines embedded within the installment, from the realization of Sansa Stark (Sophie Turner) that she will never be free and the quest of Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) within the House of the Undying, to the seeming betrayal that Jon Snow (Kit Harington) metes out to Qhorin (Simon Armstrong) in order to prove that he is a turncloak and therefore of interest to the King-Beyond-the-Wall. Hell, it's spelled out in the opening images of the episode, a close-up of an eye, belonging to the wounded Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage), as we see shadows moving in the reflection of his iris. Gorgeously filmed, it depicts the life that clings to Tyrion: watching but unable to act, as shadows dance around him, first of battle and then of those who manage to save his life.

But just when it seems as though he's made it through the battle unscathed, the sword dangling above his head drops unceremoniously: he's grievously scarred, a red wound across his face, and he's been removed from office. His deeds--the fact that he saved King's Landing--will go unrewarded, his name absent from the history books, no glory affixed to his chest. He's survived, but he's no hero, a fact that Grand Maester Pycelle (Julian Glover) takes no qualms about throwing in his face, giving him a mere coin for his troubles. It's a shameful act towards a man who only days earlier stopped the barbarians at the gate, who stood on the front line and held his ground, who refused to bow in the face of terror. The coin renders Tyrion as next to nothing, a half-man with a cheap tip. There is no hero's welcome for the Imp, no songs written in his name, no honor to be had despite the heroism he performed. (It's Conleth Hill's Varys, as usual, who speaks the truth: like the viewer, he too knows of the true deeds that Tyrion performed during the battle. Whereas others might see a "monster," he sees the hero of Blackwater.)

But, in a continent gripped by fear and war, every experience is somehow rendered bleak and tawdry. A ceremony in the throne room of King's Landing, intended to announce that Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) is the savior of the city and the new Hand of the King, is filled with as much pomp and circumstance as you might expect, but what the viewer sees--and which the attendant lords and ladies of the royal court do not--is the horse shit that piles up on the ornate rug outside those throne room doors. Not everything can be controlled or ordered, and there's always, it seems, that reminder of mortal imperfection: of the bodily functions that render each of us less than godly. Interestingly, the episode is bookended by such ephemera: Tywin's horse lets loose a mighty volley of excrement, while the men of the Night's Watch search desperately for waste to burn for fuel, digging in the icy tundra for the very thing that means the difference between life and death. An intentional juxtaposition? Absolutely.

Likewise, the juxtaposition between truth and artifice is enacted within the beautiful and somber scene between Tyrion and Shae (Sibel Kekilli), in which he pretends that their relationship is nothing more than a customer/whore dynamic. But she is not at his side for payment; whereas Pycelle offers Tyrion money, Shae offers him the redemptive power of love. He may see himself as a monster, but Shae sees him for his true beauty, his kind heart, his quick wit. She sees them as bound together, belonging to one another; the embrace that they share is a tearful one unlike that of Robb (Richard Madden) and Talisa (Oona Chaplin) who commit themselves to one another in front of the gods. There is no wedding for Tyrion and Shae and there never will be. Though they may consecrate themselves to one another in the dark of a cramped bedchamber, there is to be no marital union. The tears that Tyrion expresses in that moment is heartbreaking all the more because the viewer can see the futility of their situation: this will not end well. There are forces that want Tyrion dead and they will try again and, as much as he might love Shae, she is a weakness, a flaw in his armor. She can be used to get to him. And, as much as he wants to flee to Pentos with her, the only thing he is good at is political intrigue.

Robb Stark sees Talisa as his true love, pledging himself to her for the rest of their lives. What he doesn't see is perhaps his undoing, trading one oath for another, breaking the word he gave to the Freys. His decision reveals both the depth of his feelings for Talisa (or, perhaps his sense of honor after he had his way with her) and also his own immaturity. He sees himself as immortal or as being able to shrug off the consequences of his actions. But oaths are more than mere words, and the breaking of a sworn oath is a serious crime. Their marriage begins with the seeds of those consequences, their marriage consecrated with a broken promise and the loss of some honor.

Even Joffrey (Jack Gleeson) considers the import of such oaths, weighing the promise of betrothal he made to Sansa Stark when he is presented with a more suitable bride in the form of Margaery Tyrell (Natalie Dormer) now that Highgarden has pledged itself allies to the Lannisters. Appearing before the court, Margaery offers herself up as a new bride for the child-king, more suitable than the daughter of a "traitor" to the crown. Despite her, er, proclivities, she is presented as being "innocent" as she and Renly never consummated their marriage, a fact that Ser Loras (Finn Jones) is forced to offer up before the entire court. While Joffrey vacillates about what he is to do (whereas Robb merely acts without thought of repercussion), he does relent, casting off Sansa in favor of Margaery. But while Sansa gleefully laughs, seeing herself as free from Joffrey, it's Petyr Baelish (Aidan Gillen) who forces her to see the truth: severed legally from Joffrey, he is now free to use her even more cruelly. Her illusions are shattered, even as Littlefinger seemingly offers her the possibility of escape...

In order to survive, Jon is forced to murder Qhorin in front of the wildlings that had taken them prisoner. Goading Jon into fighting him, Qhorin knows that unless Jon is seen as a turncloak and an oathbreaker, he won't survive the day once they reach the Frostfangs and he knows that his death can save his brother from a certain death. It's a noble sacrifice that Qhorin makes, giving up his own body so that Jon can survive and come face to face with Mance Rayder, the King-Beyond-the-Wall. But it's also telling that Qhorin's last words--"We are the watchers on the wall..."--are that of the sworn oath of the Night's Watch. Its usage of the inclusive "we" is a signal, a reminder to Jon to not forget who and what he is, a lone raven in a land of ice and snow. Among by wildlings, he is not one of them, but a sworn protector of the realm. While the "free folk" might see Jon as an oathbreaker, the man who killed Qhorin Halfhand, those final words are a symbol of unity, strength, and commitment to their shared oath. His death will not be in vain.

Stannis (Stephen Dillane), meanwhile, sees his defeat at Blackwater as the end of his righteous campaign, blaming not only himself for the death of thousands of men in his army--who perished at the "seventh realm of Hell" amid chemical dragonfire--but also the red priestess, Melisandre (Carice van Houten), whose prophecies of victory failed to come through when he needed them most. I was surprised by his attempt to strangle the life out of Melisandre, and even more so when he relented when she said that her red god lives in him. She is gripped by a dangerous fanaticism, one borne out of the idea that Stannis is the reincarnation of mythical hero Azor Ahai, one that has infected Stannis as well. For a split-second, he sees the price of victory and acknowledges his crimes: the murder of his brother carried out by his and Melisandre's hands, the death of so many around him. But Melisandre offers Stannis two things: another prophecy, in which she tells him that he will betray everything and everyone he holds dear and that his ultimate victory will be worth the cost of perhaps his own soul... and she allows him to look into the flames to see what she sees. Whether this is the truth of what's to come or another dangerous illusion remains unclear, but as the flames burn in Stannis' eyes (there is the episode's eye motif again!), it's absolutely clear that he believes wholly and completely in what she's saying. A little belief can be a very dangerous thing indeed.

Arya Stark (Maisie Williams) comes face to face with some magic, as Jaqen H'ghar (Tom Wlaschiha) reveals himself outside of the gates of Harrenhal. Jaqen gives Arya several things: freedom from her servitude and her false identity, a coin which she is to give to a resident of Braavos if she finds herself in trouble, and the answer to his own nature. Jaqen is a Faceless Man, a member of a fabled guild of assassins who can change their faces as one might a set of clothes. Having repaid his debt to Arya, he sets her on a path of her own choosing, telling her that she can be anyone she wishes to be. She can go with him and learn the secrets of his trade, and enact vengeance on the litany of names she sings to herself before sleep, or she can go her own way in search of her missing family. Here, it's Arya who uses duty and honor above self-interest, opting to reunite with her clan rather than take the path of revenge.

Jaqen's final words to her--the instructions she is to use when she is again in search of him--are significant here: "Valar Morghulis." I'm tempted to reveal just what they mean, but because they weren't translated within the episode, I'm leaving that for you to puzzle out on your own, though the clues are indeed embedded deeply within the series as a whole. It is, in many ways, the underlying theme of George R.R. Martin's grand work as a whole.

While it comprised just a little scene, but I loved the interaction between Esme Bianco's Ros and Hill's Varys, in which he offers her a new opportunity. While Littlefinger sees her as nothing more than a common whore, with "a profitable collection of holes" that he can financially take advantage of, Varys sees the true skills Ros has, soliciting her not for her body but for her mind... and more importantly her ability to ferret out what men are thinking. She's ideally suited to such subterfuge and espionage, another little bird to be added to Varys' flock, a whisperer of secrets gleaned from unsuspecting men. Men, who it should be said, undervalue both Ros and Varys for the organ they lack.

Likewise, I loved that we got to see Brienne (Gwendolyn Christie) cut loose in this week's episode, showing the Stark soldiers and Jaime Lannister (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) the stern stuff that she is truly made of. While they see her as nothing more than a woman, or alternately, a freak, she proves herself more than adept at handling a sword, taking down three armed men without breaking a sweat and dishing out her own unique form of justice, giving two a "quick death" and killing the third slowly for the way in which they killed the women they had come upon. It is eye-opening both to the audience and to Jaime, his look of shock and surprise palpably etched on his face. While we only get this sequence with the two of them, it's a big step in developing their own dynamic going forward. If he believed that he could easily escape his jailor, he would be entirely wrong.

The one sequence I wasn't that crazy about was actually that of Daenerys at the House of the Undying, which I thought was not handled as well as in "A Clash of Kings." While I was happy to see Daenerys take more of an active role within her own story, there was a shabbiness to some of the House of the Undying sequence that was unexpected. I absolutely loved the illusions that she encountered on her quest to rescue her dragons--a walk through a snow-filled throne room in a destroyed King's Landing (her hand nearly touching the Iron Throne), a walk beyond the Wall in the brutal winds and ice, and a fleeting glimpse of paradise in the arms of her lost love, Khal Drogo (Jason Momoa), and the child they never had. Here, Daenerys is faced with the choice between sweet illusion and its false promise of eternal happiness or a return to the mortal realm, to the harsh truths of what she has lost, an acknowledgement of the failures and losses she has endured. This I thought was handled beautifully without the need for overt exposition.

But it was the showdown between Daenerys and Pyat Pree (Ian Hanmore) that I felt was lacking. While it made sense for her dragons to attack him, the final showdown felt more like a whiff of smoke than a full-blown fire. While Daenerys gives the order to her dragons to unleash their fire, the little trickle of flames should have been something that Pyat Pree could have easily countered. Their fire doesn't envelop the room or even, really, the warlock himself, whose magicks should have been capable of putting out such a meagre flame. What I wanted to see, if the writers were going to stray away from how the sequence plays out in the novel, was Daenerys once again surrounded by fire, the dragons' breaths cocooning around her, filling her with flame, reinforcing her own "magic," singing her hair and burning off of her in a magnificent arc of fire and rage, exploding outward at Pyat Pree. What we get instead is a mere flicker (Seriously: stop, drop, and roll surely would have saved him.) and some singed clothes before the warlock succumbs to the flames.

And Daenerys learns the episode's central lesson as well: few things are as they seem, the difference between appearing and being a vast chasm. Xaro Xhoan Daxos (Nonso Anozie) claimed that wealth beyond imagination was inside his vault, accessible only by a key he wore around his neck at all times. But once Daenerys opens it, she discovers the truth: Xaro's jewels and gold the only wealth he owns. The vault is empty, the illusion shattered. His control of Qarth founded on nothing besides smoke and mirrors, lies that enforced the image he wanted to put out to the world.

Poor Theon (Alfie Allen) is himself caught between the man is pretending to be and the man he truly is, something that Maester Luwin (Donald Sumpter) tries to teach him before it's not too late. But instead of casting off the shackles of false identity, Theon is condemned by the choices he's made, betrayed by his own men who are under siege by 500 Northerners at the gates of Winterfell, a bag placed over his head, a symbolic reminder of the fluidity of identity: prisoner, guest, family member, hostage. Lord or lickspittle. Theon's speech is him at his best, a symbol of Iron Island independence and a clarion call to arms, but it results in nothing but the destruction of Winterfell and the end of his reign as its lord. What happens to Theon remains unclear at the end of the second season. Is he taken by Ramsay Snow and the Northerners? Is he taken back to Pyke? We're given no clue, though it's clear that someone destroyed Winterfell.

(Poor Maester Luwin, meanwhile, gets the saddest death on the series since that of Ned Stark. I found myself weepy both when he was impaled on a spear and when he begs Natalia Tena's Osha to end his suffering. His death scene in the godswood, in front of the heart tree, was beautiful and elegiac. His goodbyes to the Stark lords both somber and heartfelt. In a series overflowing with death and destruction, Maester Luwin's passing is a true tragedy, reminding us that the death of a good man is always a crime, always felt, and always grievous.)

Finally, there were the three horns sounded on the Fist of the First Men, a signal that the White Walkers were upon the Night's Watch. And that they were, seemingly hundreds of wights heading straight for their encampment, lead by several of the legendary ghouls astride white mares, their glass swords gleaming in the frost, calling their hordes to battle. It's a reminder of the true battle at hand, one that goes beyond the mere game of power: it's that between good and evil, day and night, fire and ice. And those horns signal the start of the real war to come.

Season Three of Game of Thrones will begin in 2013 on HBO.

Misdirection: The Prince of Winterfell on Game of Thrones

I wasn't all that crazy about this week's episode of Game of Thrones ("The Prince of Winterfell"), written by David Benioff and D.B. Weiss and directed by Alan Taylor, which felt more like set-up for the final two episodes of the second season, than it did a fully fledged episode of its own.

Which isn't to say that there weren't any fantastic moments, because there were (the Theon/Yara scene and Tyrion/Varys exchanges being two standouts), but this week's installments was overflowing with comings and goings... and a hell of a lot of waiting around to see what would happen next.

On the one hand, this is a natural function of the narrative here as preparation are being made by Stannis (Stephen Dillane) and Ser Davos (Liam Cunningham) as they prepare to lay siege to King's Landing with their formidable fleet of ships... while Tyrion (Peter Dinklage) and the small council attempt to fortify the royal city and strategize. In other words: waiting for the inevitable. While it sets up both the inevitable conflict and helps to build tension and a sense of dread, it isn't all that exciting to watch unfold. There's a lot of standing around and pondering what will happen next... which in turn creates similar emotions within the viewer. But rather than ratchet the tension up, "The Prince of Winterfell" kept it sort of humming along, an onion bobbing gently in a still ocean, carried along by a gentle current. We're moving forward... but it's without the crests and troughs of fast-moving waves.

This is the case in much of the storylines glimpsed within "The Prince of Winterfell," which crept the plot along by an inch, rather than a league: Theon Greyjoy (Alfie Allen) waited for the arrival of his sister Yara (Gemma Whelan), who basically then left as quickly as she came, asking him to return with her to the sea. Brienne of Tarth (Gwendolyn Christie) and Ser Jaime (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) set off together as unwilling companions, Brienne ostensibly to rescue the Stark girls by trading them for Jaime, but we saw just the beginning of their journey (they got in a boat!) rather than them in media res, as it were. Jon Snow (Kit Harington) was marched along by the wildlings towards Mance Rayder, but they didn't arrive anywhere, while the men of the Night's Watch continued to wait at the Fist of the First Men. (And wait they did, though the did uncover a hidden cache of dragonglass--or obsidian--wrapped in an old Night's Watch cloak.) Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) and Ser Jorah (Iain Glen) discussed going to the House of the Undying and/or finding a ship and leaving Qarth for Astapor... but they don't actually do either.

Their binary choice--stay or flee, rescue the dragons or forget them--will have to wait until a later episode. And that's how I felt watching much of this week's installment. Decisions delayed, this was an episode of treading water, largely. A lot of set-up for the pay-offs down the road. Even the moment that was intended to shock--the reveal that the Stark boys were alive and hiding in the crypts underneath Winterfell--wasn't all that surprising, even if you hadn't read the books. (Last week, my wife turned to me immediately after Theon unveiled the "corpses" of Bran and Rickon and said, "It's those two boys from the farm." She hasn't read A Clash of Kings and expressed not even one iota of belief that Bran and Rickon had been killed, a possibility I most definitely entertained whilst reading the novel.)

What we're left with here are a few character moments that sparkle all the more for the fact that the episode itself doesn't advance the plot significantly. I loved the Yara/Theon confrontation, in which she admitted that she wanted to strangle him when he was a baby but that when she approached the crib of the bawling Theon, he quieted and smiled at her. It's a small detail but underpins her own efforts to save Theon, to convince him to leave Winterfell and return to the sea. It's also the first time that she includes him among the Ironborn, saying that they are of the sea. But Yara's earlier invective, in which she deems Theon the "Prince of Winterfell," also serves to remind Theon and the audience that the Greyjoy heir is truly a part of neither place: an outsider in both the North and the Iron Islands, fitting in nowhere. By betraying the Starks, he's cut himself off from Robb (Richard Madden) and the people who cared for him. He's a stranger to everyone, including himself.

We're not meant to feel sympathy for Theon, per se. He's a Judas, a betrayer, an upstart with a burning need to prove his worth, weak-willed and cowardly. But there are also tell-tale signs that he's perhaps puffing himself up, pretending to be the self-styled dread lord that he believes he needs to be. His attempts to get Dagmer (Ralph Ineson) to pay off the farmer, to buy his silence, reveal something that remains of the old Theon. Additionally, he doesn't actually murder Bran and Rickon, and it's Yara who gets him to see the error of his quest. Bran and Rickon were "brave," she says, for fleeing their home, which had become their prison. It's not that they're ungrateful, it's that they are not willing to go along with Theon's regime. Bu rejecting it, they reject his authority and his sovereignty. Not just as the self-styled lord of Winterfell, but as a man as well. It's for that he wants to punish them. And yet they manage to slip out of his grasp, though they are hiding, quite literally, under his nose.

The fact that Bran (Isaac Hempstead Wright), Rickon (Art Parkinson), Osha (Natalia Tena), and Hodor (Kristian Nairn) are hiding in the crypts underneath Winterfell is also significant. It is, in many ways, the best hiding place of all, because (A) no one would believe that they would willingly come back to Winterfell, much less to hide, and (B) no one has any reason to go down to the crypts except for Starks, and there are no more Starks in Winterfell. We feel this loss keenly, especially because Theon Greyjoy is no Stark, as we've been reminded of time and again. And, more than likely, his princedom in the North will be short-lived indeed, particularly as Roose Bolton (Michael McElhatton) prepares to send his bastard, Ramsay Snow, to retake Winterfell.

I have to say that I'm not enjoying the Robb/Talisa (Oona Chaplin) courtship in the least. While Talisa is significantly different from her counterpart in the novel, that's not what irks me. One has to imagine that this storyline took place "off camera" within George R.R. Martin's novel is because it's not all that interesting to watch them flirt, bond, and reminisce about their pasts. While their courtship takes a turn for the physical this week, it lands with a deafening thud. I'm not invested in their romance in the slightest and attempts to give Talisa a backstory in Volantis that pinpoints a specific moment in time that propelled her to where she is today (the near-death of her brother while swimming) felt both cheap and too on the nose. While their tryst will have resounding consequences--Robb is, after all, promised to wed one of the Freys after they allowed him use of a key bridge last season--I'm finding their storyline to be tedious at best. (I'm curious to hear what others think of it: are you as bored by Robb/Talisa as I am?)

I was happy to see the return of Ros (Esmé Bianco, whom I interviewed here), though it was--rather sadly--as part of a case of mistaken identity, with Cersei (Lena Headey), having stumbled onto the truth that Tyrion was engaged in a relationship with a whore, and wrongfully seizing Ros as the "guilty" party. There's more than a little double meaning to Tyrion's words that he won't forget about Ros, but there's also an insane relief in knowing that Shae (Sibel Kekilli) is safe... because she, like the Starks, is hiding in plain sight. There are definitely parallels to be found there, in that like the Starks hiding in the crypts, Shae has been kept in the one place that Cersei isn't likely to look: among the handmaidens. Cersei, like Theon, has a hard time looking downwards.

The real joy of the episode was in the interplay between Tyrion and Varys (Conleth Hill), whose scenes together this week positively crackled with wit and playful banter. (Hill has not really gotten the recognition he so richly deserves for his nuanced and exquisite performance as the Master of Whisperers. His Varys is one of the joys of HBO's Game of Thrones, a fantastic and gripping turn that makes Varys incredibly engaging.) I loved the two of them on the battlements together, as Varys tells Tyrion that word has reached him that Daenerys is alive and has three dragons with her.

While this news is slightly out of date (Varys still doesn't know that the dragons have been forcibly taken from Daenerys), it's still significant, made even more so by the flames behind Varys as he mentions the dragons, a nice little bit of direction by Taylor that plays up the fiery aspects of the war to come and the dragon's breath that is so desired by many.

Next week on Game of Thrones ("Blackwater"), Tyrion and the Lannisters fight for their lives as Stannis’ fleet assaults King’s Landing.

The Daily Beast: "Game of Thrones' Wild Card: Esmé Bianco"

At the heart of the ‘Game of Thrones’ sexposition controversy is Esmé Bianco’s Ros.

At The Daily Beast, you can read my latest feature, "Game of Thrones' Wild Card: Esmé Bianco," in which I sit down with Game of Thrones's Bianco to talk about Ros, a character not in George R.R. Martin's novels, sexposition, nudity, THAT scene, and more.

Fans of HBO’s Game of Thrones who have read the voluminous novels in George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series upon which the show is based often have an edge over non-readers, given that they’re only too aware of what’s to come.

But, in adapting Game of Thrones from Martin’s work, showrunners David Benioff and D.B. Weiss at times shift away from the texts to explore off-camera sequences, insert new twists and turns, and create new scenarios for the characters to face. In Season 1, Benioff and Weiss went so far to create an original character just for the show: prostitute Ros, who quickly fell into bed with several of the major players and continues to turn up throughout the show’s second season.

A fiery redhead who has clawed her way to a position of relative power within a King’s Landing brothel owned by Aidan Gillen’s Petyr “Littlefinger” Baelish, Ros is played by 29-year-old English actress Esmé Bianco, a former burlesque performer, singer, and Agent Provocateur and Modern Courtesan lingerie model. Originally intended to appear in just the pilot, Bianco—who said her character was created initially as a “plot device”—has continued to add a level of unpredictability to the proceedings. Because she was created for the television show, viewers never know what to expect from Ros … or what her role in the overall story will become.

When we last saw Bianco’s Ros, who returns to Game of Thrones in Sunday’s episode, she was forced to brutally beat a fellow prostitute, Daisy (Maisie Dee), by the sociopathic child-king Joffrey (Jack Gleeson). It was a savage, disturbing scene of escalation and punishment, and served as a reminder that Ros is a pawn in a larger game of power.

“Things don’t become much sunnier for Ros,” Bianco told The Daily Beast, over cocktails at a West Hollywood hideaway. “I was trying to think of one character who is having a good time at the moment … and there’s no one. She’s having as much of a tough time as everyone else.”

Continue reading at The Daily Beast...

Where The Wild Things Are: The Old Gods and the New on Game of Thrones

"You can't tame a wild thing. You can't trust a wild thing... Wild creatures have their own rules, their own reasons, and you'll never know them."

This week's breathtaking episode of Game of Thrones ("The Old Gods and the New"), written by Vanessa Taylor and directed by David Nutter, is easily my favorite episode of the season to date, not least of which is because it departs significantly from George R.R. Martin's novel. While this may alarm some purists, the ability to inject surprise and shock in even the most knowledgeable readers is something to celebrate here; it raises the stakes significantly and allows writers like Taylor (who, it must be said, is delivering truly fantastic work) and David Benioff and Dan Weiss flexibility when it comes to crafting the story. Too often in adaptations, it's impossible to take meaningful detours on the way to their respective stories' ultimate destinations.

Here such detours should be held up and praises, so long as they allow the viewer to evaluate the material in a different way, to experience the story (and the novel's subplots, as well as its many off-screen developments) in a new and interesting way. The Arya (Maisie Williams) and Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) scenes are sensational and reveal elements of both characters in a way that would not be possible other than putting them in a room together. Watching Arya conceal her identity--even when faced by the unexpected arrival of Littlefinger (Aidan Gillen)--and dance around the fact that she's a high-born lady is genius; it displays her own sense of cunning and need to survive at all costs, subsuming her identity within whatever is immediately available. We get this notion from A Clash of Kings as well, seeing her transform from Arya to Arry to the Ghost of Harrenhal, borrowing a new identity as one might a cloak. But here, she's put to the ultimate test, facing down her ultimate enemy in the belly of the beast. The moments of subterfuge--distracting Tywin with a question so she can nab the scroll on the table--play out magnificently; she doles out bits of her assumed identity as a means of gaining her adversary's confidence and trust.

We're told in the episode, by Shae (Sibel Kikelli), that we should trust no one. This is especially true in Westeros and Essos: trust and loyalty are things to be exploited rather than rewarded. The dog at your table will bite you as soon as it will save you. Civility, it seems, is a fragile shell. Crack it even barely and you find the true savagery of most people.

Which is largely what "The Old Gods and the New" is about: the wild, untamed spirit of some of the characters. Just as Theon (Alfie Allen) betrays the Starks, despite being raised at Winterfell "among [the Starks] but never one of them," the notion of wildness permeates the entirely episode, from Ghost's standoffishness beyond the Wall and Qhorin's words to Jon to Ygritte (Rose Leslie) and Osha (Natalia Tena). Is it ever possible to tame something wild and unpredictable? Or, phrased differently, are we all just as wild at heart, underneath the pretense that we're honorable?

It's interesting that it's the most wild among the Westerosi--the Hound (Rory McCann), Sandor Clegane, who Joffrey further humiliates by calling "Dog"--who is actually the most honorable, noble, and chivalrous of the lot at King's Landing. A crowd gathering in the streets of King's Landing to gawk at the royal processional after Myrcella (Aimee Richardson) is sent off to Dorne turns violent quickly. When a cowpie is thrown at him, King Joffrey (Jack Gleeson) reacts with such petulance that the mob turns ugly. The High Septon is literally ripped apart by the mob, his arm held up like a trophy by one of the unwashed mass. Citizens they may all be, but their baser instincts quickly take root when Joffrey eggs them on, promising death as recompense for their insulting behavior. Their frenzy turns deadly: besides for the High Septon's gruesome end, there are multiple murders and rapes (Lollys Stokeworth, was that you?) and Sansa (Sophie Turner) is pursued and attacked by several men.

I was glad to see that Sansa didn't relent, but fought back, despite being outnumbered and outmatched. The horror of the near-gang rape scene was keenly felt in her terror and distress and the savage and uncaring masks of her attackers, seeing her as something to be destroyed, to be bloodied and used, to be cast off like garbage. It's the Hound, of course, who comes to her rescue, the "monster" who is far more civilized than his master--or anyone, really--would give him credit for. (In fact, it's the fourth time the Hound has saved her: last season, he chided Joffrey when he made Sansa stare at Ned's rotten head on a spike; he saved her from a beating when he told Joffrey that Sansa wasn't just being superstitious when she made the comment about his name day; he gave her his cloak when Joffrey orders her stripped in the throne room.)

Upon seeing the frenzy of the crowd, the first thought that Tyrion (Peter Dinklage) has is of Sansa's safety, but he's thinking in far more pragmatic terms, seeing the Stark girl as a bargaining chip, a hostage, a pawn. It's not the Hound's perception. He sees Sansa as a "little bird" whom he saves from the hungers of the crowd, bringing her back to the keep so she can be returned to her "cage." His sense of honor and morality is at odds with both his "freakish" appearance and his own use of brutality. Rather than just save Sansa, he disembowels one of her captors and slays them all gruesomely. He has the bottle to be just as brutal as anyone else, but he has a moral code that sets him apart from the wildness of those around him, particularly flailing, bratty Joffrey. It takes a swift slap across the face from Tyrion to get Joffrey to calm down and see the error of what he's done, allowing Sansa out of their hands. Tyrion might be honorable, but he's also sensible: lose Sansa and they lose their only shot at getting Jaime (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau) back from the Starks. ("You owe him quite a bit," Tyrion says of Jaime. HE'S YOUR FATHER, he seems to shout silently. YOU FOOL.)

But that wild influence isn't limited to just a rioting crowd in King's Landing: it's felt potently beyond the Wall and at Winterfell. Both Theon and Osha were kept as prisoners, though Theon's cage, as opposed to Sansa's at King's Landing, was far less obvious. It's clear that he has a lot of resentment towards Ned Stark and towards his "brothers." While we're not treated to the siege itself, Theon manages to pull it off without much bloodshed, waking Bran (Isaac Hempstead-Wright) up to tell him that seized Winterfell and that he should yield to him. It's here where things go horribly wrong, particularly concerning the death of Ser Rodrik Cassel (Ron Donachie), the castellan of Winterfell. When Ser Rodrik refuses to yield or bow before the self-styled prince, Theon is determined to use him as an example. But it's Ser Rodrik's final words ("Now, you are truly lost.") that will echo for an eternity for Theon; his decision to commit murder, to eradicate the last vestiges of honor and of Ned Stark's teachings will damn him forever. Theon can't even give Ser Rodrik a clean death; unlike Ned Stark, Theon doesn't know how to behead him cleanly. Ser Rodrik's death is messy, and gruesome, and prolonged. He may have swung the sword, but he wasn't worthy of carrying out this execution. His attempt to take Ned's place only reminded everyone of how unworthy he truly is.

Interestingly, it's Jon Snow (Kit Harington) who has learned from his father. When he and the members of the rangers under Qhorin Halfhand (Simon Armstrong) come across a wildling party and he unmasks one of them as a woman, it's Jon who offers to kill her himself rather than have Qhorin or the others do it. After learning that the free folk are gathering in the "hundreds and thousands" in the Frostfangs, Ygritte has outlived her usefulness; her kind would kill Qhorin as soon as spit at him. It's the only thing to do and Jon takes it upon himself to behead her. But for all of her wild nature, Ygritte relents, turning over and putting her head on the rock, muttering how "cold" the sword is on her neck, begging him to do it and make her death a clean one. (And to burn her body afterward, so that she doesn't return as a wight.) But Jon can't bring himself to kill a woman; his honor part and parcel of who he is, his connection to morality marking him as a son of Ned Stark. Instead, Ygritte makes her escape, leading Jon to give chase in order to stop her.

(Aside: while I commented on it last week as well, the scenery and cinematography here are stunning. The Icelandic glacier where this was shot gives a haunting wildness to the backdrop as well as a stirring realism. The ice and frost of beyond the Wall was masterfully juxtaposed with the balmy sunniness of King's Landing as Myrcella is sent off. And, yes, I did hear the cry of the eagle over the glacier when Jon and the Night's Watch attacked the wildling camp. Hmmm...)

Later, Jon is forced to spend the night with his prisoner, to cuddle up next to her in order to stay alive, their body heat protecting them from the brutal cold. But Ygritte isn't content to just lie there; she wriggles next to Jon in an effort to turn him on, to torment him. But Jon took an oath of chastity and he's not falling for Ygritte's trickery. Or has he? Has Jon underestimated her own cunning and strength because he sees her as a woman rather than a wildling, a warrior?

It's a mistake that Theon makes as well, seeing Osha as something wild, a dog, a "kitchen slut," rather than a threat. By seducing Theon and going after his own base, animal instincts, she gains mastery over the "prince," using the opportunity to lead Bran, Rickon (Art Parkinson), Hoder, and the direwolves to safety. Clearly, Taylor meant for us to think that Osha had gone to the other side and was engaged in some self-preservation, but her misdirection here concealed Osha's true plan: escape. She trusted in the predictions contained in Bran's dream and the death of Ser Rodrik completed the prophecy therein. But Bran's connection to these dreams, to the three-eyed raven, signal something wild in themselves, something that Osha can't leave behind with Theon. And so this makeshift band of survivors slips out beyond the walls of Winterfell.

Just as magic seems to be creeping back into the world, so too is a wildness as well: the unpredictable, uncontrollable nature of several characters is commented on as well as a connection to something old and wild and unbreakable. Dragons have returned, a boy sees through the eyes of a direwolf, a red woman conjures shadows from her womb.

Qhorin's words to Jon that his death will matter little to the southerners on the other side of the wall--that he'll die a bastard and no one will even know his name--are significant. Their responsibility to protect the realm comes first before everything, even their lives, but they shouldn't give those away so freely either. It's their swords and shields that create the fragile sense of civilization of society; their sacrifice ensures the safety of so many others. Which makes it all the more heartbreaking when that shell is broken.

On the other side of the sea, Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) offers her own wildness to the Spice King (Nicholas Blane), demanding a fleet of ships so that she can "retake" the Iron Throne. The Spice King is clearly being set up here--haughty and rude, outspoken and predatory--as the culprit in the theft of Daenerys' dragons and the murder of poor Irri (Amrita Acharia), a storyline that doesn't appear in the books at all. But I'm not so sure that he's behind it. Rather, I think he's a red herring, the obvious choice for being the mastermind behind the theft of the three dragons... and that the Undying are behind it instead.

Whether I'm reading too much into things remains to be seen, but I hope that, regardless, the Spice King gets his comeuppance, though I will miss his imperiousness ("This one has a talent for drama"). Instead, he or someone else has awakened the dragon, prompting Daenerys to go into "fire and blood" mode and smite her enemies. Her own abilities--that of precognitive visions and invulnerability to fire--separate her from being a mere human or a "little princess." She too is as wild and untamable as her dragons. And just as deadly.

Some other stray observations:
-I'm glad that Robb (Richard Madden) caught Lady Talisa (Oona Chaplin) in lies so easily. She is not who she claims to be, something noticed by both Robb and instantly by Catelyn (Michelle Fairley) upon meeting her. Catelyn reminds Robb that he has responsibilities and debts that cannot be cancelled out: he is not free to love, but is promised to another. Yet, there's Talisa...
-I loved the scene where Littlefinger nearly noticed Arya was Tywin's cupbearer but kept getting distracted. Littlefinger is a crafty one, but Arya kept turning away every time his attentions became fixed on her. Did he notice and not say anything? Or does he never fully process who is actually standing right in front of him the entire time? Hmmm.
-The death of Amory Lorch was fantastic, as Jaqen (Tom Wlaschiha) assassinates him within seconds of Arya giving him the second name. That he falls face-down on the floor in front of Tywin was amazing.
-The banter between Joffrey and Sansa as Myrcella sailed off was priceless. "Well, it's not really relevant then, is it?" He's such a ponce.
-The Hound's words to Tyrion: "I didn't do it for you." Ooh.
-Jaime was dyslexic! I loved getting a glimpse into his childhood and Tywin's own feelings about his children, refusing to give him on Jaime and teaching him to read, despite what the maesters said about his inability. And Tywin's feelings towards his own father, who ruined them and their family name. But Arya scores a point on Tywin for quick wit when she's asked what killed her father. Her answer, fittingly: "Loyalty."
-It's Roose Bolton (Michael McElhatton) who brings word of the siege of Winterfell and offers to send his bastard to take back the castle. Robb acquiesces, but says that he (A) wants Theon kept alive, and (B) that Rickon and Bran's safety is paramount. Oh, Robb, this is a family whose sigil is a flayed man. You're not going to get levelheadedness from this clan; what you'll get is violence and brutality.

All in all, "The Old Gods and New" represented a massive achievement for Game of Thrones, a stunning display of well-crafted dialogue, subtle acting, deliberate pacing, and glorious setting, and the firm establishment that the show's continuity is well and truly separate from that of the novels. It seems as though the wild things are truly everywhere in the midst of war. Whether you try to tame them or cage them, they have a nasty way of biting you--or worse--when you turn your back. Could it be that Shae is right and the best course is to trust no one? Or does that way folly lie as well? Regardless, it seems as though the danger is only beginning and that before long Westeros could be overrun by wildlings... or destroyed from within. Either way, this way the true erasure of civilization lies.

Next week on Game of Thrones (“A Man Without Honor”), Jaime (Nicolaj Coster-Waldau) meets a distant relative; Dany receives an invitation to the House of the Undying; Theon leads a search party; Jon loses his way in the wilderness; Cersei (Lena Headey) counsels Sansa (Sophie Turner).

Hard Truths: The Ghost of Harrenhal on Game of Thrones

"Hard truths cut both ways..."

These words, uttered by Stannis Baratheon (Stephen Dillane), are brimming with power and potency and an absolute truth of their own: the hardest truths are the ones that cut us the deepest, that remind us that our perceptions are faulty or our world is off-kilter, that serve to wake us up to some reality heretofore unseen or unrealized.

And, yes, the sharpness of the hardest truths--as fine-edged as a Valyrian dagger--can cut more than just the utterer to the quick. In the case of Stannis and his Onion Knight, Ser Davos Seaworth (Liam Cunningham), the reality of their situation injures them both. As Davos tries to demonstrate his loyalty to his king by sharing his concerns about Melisandre (Carice van Houten), it's Stannis who takes umbrage at his comments, refusing to discuss just what happened in the cave (see last week's review), refusing the acknowledge the inherent truth of what Davos is saying. ("I've never known you to hide from the truth," he says sadly.) But sometimes those hard truths aren't just sharp, they're often invisible to the naked eye, a fire in the snowy distance, a shadow on the wind. And, like an assassin in the night, they can shatter our lives forever.

On this week's sensational episode of Game of Thrones ("The Ghost of Harrenhal"), written by David Benioff and D.B. Weiss and directed by David Petrarca, several characters had to face up to some harsh truths about themselves and their potential fates, amid a sweeping change that may have come as a surprise to viewers who haven't read George R.R. Martin's novels. The death of Renly Baratheon (Gethin Anthony) kicks open a host of possibilities, even as it shatters the rivalry between the two Baratheon brothers. It's no mistake that the inky shadow, born from the womb of the red woman, takes on the form of Stannis before it murders poor, doomed Renly before the eyes of Catelyn Stark (Michelle Fairley) and Brienne of Tarth (Gwendolyn Christie).

It's significant that the assassination of the would-be king occurs in front of two characters, aligning them closely with the audience's experience: after all, we too act as unwitting witnesses in the crime, unable to stop what's unfolding before us, forced to watch something that's incomprehensible and seemingly impossible. Shadows do not kill, regardless of any ill wind that brings the inky intruder into the tent of the king. Just as Brienne and Catelyn are shocked into action, we too are awakened from our own viewing slumber, watching a king die and these two women suspected of the horrific crime of regicide. It's Renly's death that also likewise demonstrates the depths of Brienne's feelings for the fallen stag, holding Renly in her arms as life flutters out of his body. It's Catelyn's force of will that snaps Brienne out of her grief and out of doing something foolish. "You can't avenge him if you're dead," she says, stating the obvious in a way. But for honor-bound Brienne, self-preservation would take a back seat to her own sense of vengeance.

(I loved the later scene between the two women, where Brienne pledges her fealty and service to Catelyn and admits her love for Renly: "I only held him that once as he was dying." Christie is superlative here, rendering a tragic air to Brienne even as she remains honorable, strong, and courageous... and even a little misogynistic, such as when she declares Catelyn's courage to be womanly, rather than the courage of the battlefield.)

It's the same truth that's presented before Ser Loras (Finn Jones) and Margaery (Natalie Dormer) as well. Now that Renly death has traveled around camp, the Tyrells are in serious danger. Littlefinger (Aidan Gillen) presents but two options: stay and die or flee and live. Catelyn's words are echoed by Margaery's here to her brother ("You can't avenge him from the grave"), which establishes that both Loras and Brienne loved Renly in their own ways, though it was Loras' love which was returned by the king. The truth is that Renly would have made a good king, though he was motivated by pride in certain circumstances, and he clearly underestimated his brother's ruthless cunning.

But it's Margaery who embraces the notion of hard truths here, giving Dormer a chance to shine in the scene. "Calling yourself a king doesn't make you one," she says without a hint of irony (she's correct: you can crown yourself anything you like, but it doesn't bring with it any real legitimacy), and, ultimately, that her desire is bigger than one might have suspected. "I want to be THE queen," she tells Littlefinger. In the War of Five Kings, that's saying quite a lot about both her ambition and her drive, yet another example of the Queen of Thorns persona that's been fused here with Margaery. She's got her eye on the ultimate prize and won't settle for marrying well. She wants to be the most important woman in the Seven Kingdoms. Given her thirst for power, she's one to keep in the crosshairs. She's proven here just how dangerous she could be.

The notion of truth is wound throughout the episode: Tyrion (Peter Dinklage) and Lancel (Eugene Simon) engage in a discussion about truth and honesty; Osha (Natalia Tena) and Bran (Isaac Hempstead-Wright) call each other liars and conceal elements of truth from each other; Davis and Stannis square off over Melisandre; Ayra (Maisie Williams) faces an uncomfortable truth; Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) realizes the truth about what Jorah (Iain Glen) feels for her; and Theon (Alfie Allen) realizes that his men don't respect him a jot.

It's Dagmer (The Office's Ralph Ineson) who opens his eyes in that instance, telling Theon that the Ironborn will not respect him until he can prove himself. That's true as well of Lord Balon (Patrick Malahide) and Yara (Gemma Whelan) as well. But it's more than just a matter of Theon proving his worth: he needs to prove his loyalty and his sense of identity. Is he an Iron Islander or a ward of the North? In stumbling onto a plan to take Torrhen's Square--just 40 leagues away from Winterfell--Theon discovers a means to obliterate his past and prove his value to everyone around him. Rather than pillage the Stony Shore, this gambit strikes a brutal blow to the North, and sadly it's Bran who plays into Theon's hands.

Like his father, Bran has a deeply ingrained sense of honor and responsibility. He is a Stark and he sees his feudal duty in much the same way that Ned did. He believes he has an obligation to his bannerman just as they do to him. The attack on Torrhen's Square warrants a response in turn; his people need him. So Bran sends a troupe of men to push back the attack, unaware that the attackers are not Southerners but the Ironborn. It connects deeply to Bran's own prophetic dream of the sea spilling over the walls of Winterfell, emptying the sea into the castle. The Iron Islanders, of course, represent the flowing sea, and the fact that the three-eyed raven appeared in this dream make it more than just mere nightmare. Osha is unwilling to tell Bran about the true nature of the three-eyed raven, though she's clearly shaken by the symbolic meaning of his dream. And we should be too, particularly the death of Ser Rodrik (Ron Donachie) and the implication that the Ironborn will attack Winterfell directly, bringing Theon against the "brothers" he was raised with. Will his willingness to take command conflict with any genuine feeling he has or had for Bran, whose life he saved last season? Hmmm.

I loved the amazing scene beween Arya and Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) at Harrenhal. Catching Arya in a lie about where she comes from, the scene not only connects to the early episodes of Season One--in which Arya moaned about her sigil lessons--but also proved not only the insight of Tywin (last week, he knew she wasn't a boy; this week, he knows she's not from Maidenpool) but also the burning heart of Arya Stark. At her enemy's table, her words are more than mere trifles when she says that "Anyone can be killed." Tywin may be asking about Rob Stark, but her comments can be taken to be far more general than that. We've seen a king die in this episode alone; last season, both Robert (Mark Addy) and Ned (Sean Bean) were killed off. In a world as brutal and unpredictable as this one, anyone can be killed: a pauper or a king, a whore or a general. No one is safe and none of us can ever escape death in the end. Williams is amazing here, holding her own with Dance, her words carefully measured and loaded with meaning, a cupbearer who on the surface agrees with her lord but who has a holy vengeance in her heart.

It's that fire that leads her to Jaqen H'ghar (Tom Wlaschiha), with whom she crosses paths immediately after the scene with Tywin Lannister. I'm loving Wlaschiha as Jaqen; his words are whispered smoke on the air, coiling their way around the ears and minds of those they encounter. Here, he tells Arya that because she took three lives from the "red god" (Melisandre's R'hllor again), they must give them back, and he offers her a Faustian bargain: she can give him the names of three people to kill and he will do so. She doesn't hesitate when she offers up The Tickler, and at the end of the episode, their tormentor is dead at the hand of Jaqen, who gives Arya a subtle confirmation, a single finger on his cheek. The titular ghost has risen in the burned castle.

That sense of dread connects to Jon Snow (Kit Harington) at the Fist of the First Men, beyond the Wall. While the others imagine what could have led the First Men here, Jon says simply, "I think they were afraid." His truth connects both to a deeper truth and an inner one. They're all out of their element, vulnerable and cut off from civilization, in enemy territory where the enemy isn't just a wildling with a sharpened spear but something ancient and evil as well. There's a tremendous sense of foreshadowing here when Sam (John Bradley-West) recounts just what all of the horns are sounded for: one for friend, two for wildling, and three for "white walkers." (Likewise, speaking of foreshadowing, there's this instance, Bran's dream, and then the Tyrion/Bronn scene with the wildfire "bomb" under the city, each of which screams out for resolution.) Jon finally casts off his role as steward to fulfill his dream of becoming a ranger, and following in his uncle Benjen's footsteps. While we just get a little bit of Qhorin Halfhand (Simon Armstrong) here, I think he's fantastic.

(Aside: I loved the glacier scenes that were shot in Iceland and which revolved around the men of the Night's Watch here. These types of stunning shots and sweeping expanses are something that Game of Thrones does so well, shooting in far-flung locations rather than just doing CGI for everything and shooting it green-screen style in a warehouse. You can't approximate the sort of majesty and magic that is accomplished by putting your actors in the actual environment, as they've done here, and the show and HBO deserves to be applauded for that.)

While Qhorin fit with the mental image in my head, I can't say that I quite pictured Quaithe (Laura Pradelska), the masked woman who approaches Ser Jorah at the party, in the way that she's depicted here. While the voice and acting were perfectly suitable, the mask threw me off because in the books it's described as being a lacquered wooden mask, which wasn't at all what was depicted here. While I'm typically not one for crying out when an adaptation differs in terms of the physical representation of the characters, this was one case where I was confused a bit, as Quaithe is wearing something closer to a balaclava than the mask that Martin describes. It seemed a little out of place and odd here, I suppose, and took me out of the reality of the characters a little bit, particularly as Quaithe is meant to be mysterious and unknowable; it seemed to reduce her to something not all that memorable or otherworldly. (Book readers: what did you think? Was I the only one put off by Quaithe?)

Still, that's a minor quibble when it comes to an episode this strong and compelling. It was fantastic to see Daenerys and the Dothraki khalassar moving among the terraced gardens of Qarth and attending a civilized party held in her honor. From the first scene of Dany, her handmaidens, and the dragons--with its own sense of truth ("Men like to talk about other men when they're happy")--to the proposal scene, it's a different side of Danaerys than we've gotten to see much of, beyond the pilot, in the series thus far. The reappearance of Pyat Pree (Ian Hanmore) here was a welcome addition, connecting to her "welcome" by the Thirteen in last week's episode and setting up the notion of the House of the Undying, a place of study and contemplation for the city's fabled warlocks. While Xaro Xhoan Daxos (Nonso Anozie) believes that their magic is nothing more than "parlor tricks," we've seen now firsthand that magic has been returning to the world once more. Why should Melisandre have a monopoly on such power?

While Xaro sees Daenerys as a conquerer, she sees him as one too, albeit one without the ambition that she has. But even as Dany sees in him the potential for wealth with which to launch an attack on Westeros and reclaim her rightful place on the Iron Throne, he sees her as a means of obtaining power for himself and his offspring. Which is why Ser Jorah tries to convince Danaerys to find another way. But even as Danaerys is blind about Xaro's intentions, she has misread Jorah's, laughing off Xaro's insistence that her advisor has feelings for her.

Jorah's speech to her reveals the hard truth about his own feelings for the khalessi. "You have a gentle heart," he says. "There are times when I look at you and I still can't believe you are real." It's perhaps one of the most honest and pure statements within the show to date, a confession of love and devotion that goes beyond mere fealty. Just as Brienne fell in love with Renly, so too as Jorah for Danaerys. But a queen isn't just a woman, but a ruler and rulers often have to make hard sacrifices in order to ensure the safety of themselves and their people. Danaerys isn't free to give her heart away, just as Jorah isn't free to ask for it. If that isn't a hard truth, one that definitely cuts both ways, I don't know what is. And sadly it's all the more likely that there will be anguish and pain for both in the days to come.

On the next episode of Game of Thrones ("The Old Gods and the New"), Theon (Alfie Allen) completes his master stroke; in King’s Landing, the Lannisters send Myrcella (Aimee Richardson) from harm’s way in the nick of time; Arya (Maisie Williams) comes face to face with a surprise visitor; Dany (Emilia Clarke) vows to take what is hers; Robb (Richard Madden) and Catelyn (Michelle Fairley) receive crucial news; Qhorin (Simon Armstrong) gives Jon (Kit Harington) a chance to prove himself.

Shadows Dance: The Magic Lantern on Game of Thrones

In a series that's been full of mythical beings, prophetic dreams, wights, and dragons, this week's episode of Game of Thrones tipped the balance more firmly into the supernatural camp, giving us to date possibly the most visceral (and disturbing) reminder that magic is slowly creeping back into the Seven Kingdoms Westeros. Our reaction to that as viewers takes two directions: one is excitement, the other is dread. Some have convinced themselves that this isn't a fantasy series, and that's perhaps the wrong approach. While Game of Thrones is certainly populist fare, it's rooted in the fantasy genre and its slow integration of supernatural elements is to be applauded, though they were part and parcel of the series from the very first scene.

The White Walkers have always posed a threat to the Seven Kingdoms and therefore to the realm of man. Whatever happened thousands of years earlier to drive the White Walkers beyond the Wall and also end the reign of the Children of the Forest toyed with the natural order, casting out much of the magical nature of the world and granting dominion over the earth to that of mankind. But if George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire teaches us anything, it's that magic will out in the end. Dragons have returned to the world, borne out of smoke and fire and grief, children of a exiled princess already in widow's weeds. The White Walkers creep in snow and darkness beyond the Wall. And a red priestess, a glittering red ruby at her throat, has powers that can scarcely be described.

We've seen already that Melisandre (Carice van Houten) has abilities that set her beyond mere mortals. In her first appearance, she shrugs off an assassination attempt by drinking a chalice full of poisoned wine while her would-be killer bleeds out at her feet. Clearly, the Red Woman is connected to the natural magics of the world, and to abilities granted to her by the so-called Lord of Light, her deity R'hllor. In this week's episode, Melisandre makes a good point about duality: without light, there are no shadows. In a land as brutal as Westeros--which this episode went to great lengths to prove--this is especially important. How we define such attributes as goodness, peace, mercy, etc. are only in opposition to their counter-natures: evil, war, punishment. R'hllor himself is said to be locked in battle with his own nemesis: the Nameless One, whose dominion over darkness, ice, and death comprises the first half of Martin's "song." These notions are forever struggling both internally and externally: they posit change, transformation, destruction, rebirth. The wheel turns anew, the cycle perpetuates.

This week's episode of Game of Thrones ("Garden of Bones"), written by Vanessa Taylor and directed by David Petrarca, put the emphasis on the darker element of man, focusing on punishment, torture, and the erasure of morals and constraints. It's felt keenly throughout the episode, from the torture of the prisoners in Harrenhal--an effort to extract information about the "Brotherhood" and whether there is silver and/or gold kept in the village--and their needless execution for sport (hence the jocular savagery of the torture, accompanied by apple-eating by the interrogator known as The Tickler) to the cruelty of King Joffrey (Jack Gleeson), his foppish crown worn in an effort to appear rakish, but whose deeds signal him as undeniably blackhearted and morally bankrupt.

Here, Joffrey is revealed to be a true sociopath. When he cannot torment poor Sansa (Sophie Turner) by humiliating and beating her in the throne room, Joffrey turns to the name-day presents sent to him by his uncle Tyrion (Peter Dinklage), two whores--Ros (Esme Bianco) and Daisy (Maisie Dee)--who are there to "unclog" the little king but who end up at the receiving end of his cruel nature. Rather than use the women for pleasure, he forces them to enact a terrible game of pain, pushing Ros to beat her companion with increasing brutality while he loads a crossbow and points it at her. While Ros admonishes the king for spoiling pleasure with too much pain, it's clear that the only pleasure Joffrey can experience is by seeing others humiliated or enslaved, beaten or goaded. (Interestingly, there's a thematic flip here: while it's The Tickler who is eating an apple at Harrenhal, it's poor Daisy who is eating one here when Joffrey enters the room. While the brutality is similar, it's directed in an inimical fashion.)

Joffrey orders his betrothed to be stripped in the throne room and beaten by a member of his Kingsguard, he claims in an effort to "punish" her for the victories experienced by her brother Robb (Richard Madden). But the nature of her punishment is just that: to punish Sansa simply because she is there. Whatever message Joffrey claims to be sending to Robb in the field, it's really just an opportunity to engage in some Caligula-like behavior. When he's thwarted in his exercise by Tyrion, he repays his uncle by tormenting the prostitutes sent to appease him. But the little king isn't one for the pleasures of the bedchamber. He craves the brutality of war, transforming his bed into nothing less than an instrument of torture, making him as bad as the Tickler, Polliver, and the others in Harrenhal. (Echoing this notion is Robb's bannerman Roose Bolton, who says that while a naked man has few secrets, a flayed man has none. But this is a man who wears a flayed corpse as his sigil, after all.) He wants Tyrion to find out what he's done; in fact, he craves it.

Civility is a flimsy facade. Even the most civilized here can be seen to be ruthless in their pursuit of their goals. Stannis (Stephen Dillane) breaks all manner of moral codes by ordering Davos (Liam Cunningham) to take Melisandre ashore, following a belief that the ends justify the means. Stannis proves himself here only too willing to ignore the articles of war and instead resort to both subterfuge and supernatural means of gaining the upper hand, sending Melisandre to birth a shadow creature--which takes the form of a man--and carry out his instructions. Melisandre herself believes in the justness of her actions and of what they do, seeing Stannis as the reincarnation of mythical hero Azor Ahai, but there's something deeply disturbing about what occurs in the cave beneath Renly's camp, the inky shadow spilling from her womb igniting a sense of revulsion and of horror in the viewer. It's unnatural and positions us as opposed to her form of fiery magic. While those shadows may not exist without the light of the lantern, which grows extremely bright, it represents the dark underbelly (no pun intended) to her supernatural abilities: something unwholesome, something less than sacred.

Likewise, it's the Thirteen of Qarth who prove that their own gentility is a false mask for unspeakable behavior. The titular garden of bones around the fabled walled city of Qarth grows more and more because the Qartheen deny entrance to their city to most travelers, allowing them to undergo painful starvation, dehydration, and ultimately death in the dessert, turning away their faces from the suffering they themselves caused. Its inherent cruelty is thematically linked with the other examples in the episode, demonstrating just what a harsh world this truly is, even far removed from the battlefields.

In denying Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) and her khalassar entry when she refuses to produce her dragons for their amusement. Daenerys' pleas--and then threats--fall on deaf ears until Xaro Xhoan Daxos (Nonso Anozie) pledges to take responsibility for their entrance. Whether it's an act of kindness or of more simple greed or gain remains to be seen, but it is an advantage for Daenerys, at lest.

Still, if we're to follow the notion of duality further still, there is also mercy to be found. Tywin Lannister (Charles Dance) is certainly not someone from whom we'd expect to encounter this, but his mercy is a logical, rather than emotionally based one. He orders the movement of the prisoners of Harrenhal to actual cells and demands that they stop killing those interrogated and instead put them to work (saving the life of Joe Dempsie's Gendry in the process) and he recognizes Arya for what she is: a girl in boy's clothing. Removing her from shackles, he names her his new cup-bearer. (This is a significant change from the novel, where Arya may serve as a cup-bearer at Harrenhal, but never to Tywin. However, the change places her even closer to the belly of the beast and in even more danger of being discovered as Arya of House Stark.)

And then there's the mysterious "Talisa" (Oona Chaplin of The Hour), whose acquaintance Robb Stark makes on the battlefield and whose sense of mercy and kindness extend beyond familial boundaries. She travels the field of battle bringing comfort (and wielding a knife in the case of gangrene) to those in need. Her position about war is at odds with Robb's campaign, and her forthrightness is meant to demonstrate a clear sexual tension between the two. She is not afraid to point out the fallacy of Robb's belief that killing these men will
avenge his father's death, or that he needn't concern himself with who takes the Iron Throne after he's relieved Joffrey of his crown and his life. While she claims to be from Volantis, this appears to be a lie, along with her identity. Book readers will be only too aware of who Chaplin appears to be playing, though the circumstances seem to be quite different than what the reader is told in A Clash of Kings... That's all I'll say on that front for now.

A few other random thoughts: I loved the scene between Margaery (Natalie Dormer) and Littlefinger (Aidan Gillen) at Renly's encampment. While he rather salaciously references the relationship between Renly (Gethin Anthony) and Ser Loras (Finn Jones) and tries to get a rise out of Margaery by explicitly stating that she is not sleeping with her husband. Margaery--in a little bit of Queen of Thorns mode--turns the tables on Littlefinger, reminding him of two truths: that he is himself not married and that he seems confused by the entire notion. "My husband is my king and my king is my husband," she said plainly. If that's not the best summation of the compromises we make in life, I don't know what is. Additionally, I loved seeing Catelyn (Michelle Fairley) quite so quick with that blade as she was, turning on Littlefinger for betraying Ned, and for the somber tenderness of the scene in which she finally received Ned's bones, so that they may be interred with his ancestors at Winterfell. Home is, after all, where the heart (tree) is.

What did you think of this week's episode, and of the overt move to supernatural elements? Were you put off by the brutality of several storylines? I'm curious to hear your reactions: head to the comments section and let me know your take on "Garden of Bones."

On the next episode of Game of Thrones (“The Ghost of Harrenhal”), the end of the Baratheon rivalry drives Catelyn to flee and Littlefinger to act; at Kingʼs Landing, Tyrionʼs source alerts him to Joffreyʼs flawed defense plan and a mysterious secret weapon; Theon sails to the Stony Shore to prove heʼs worthy to be called Ironborn; in Harrenhal, Arya receives a promise from Jaqen Hʼghar, one of three
prisoners she saved from the Gold Cloaks; the Nightʼs Watch arrive at the Fist of the First Men, an ancient fortress where they hope to stem the advance of the wildling army.